Because it would count as plagiarism and plagiarism is like a law.
The statement about Du Halfe that would lead historians to question the objectivity of his portrayal of the scholars is that he was Jesuit and based his book on Jesuit missionary reports
<h3>What is a Factual Statement? </h3>
This refers to type of statement that is accurate and can be relied on for academic purposes.
Hence, we can see that from the complete text, even though the statements about Du Halde are factually accurate, one can question the objectivity.
This is because of his portrayal of the scholars that he was Jesuit and based his book on Jesuit missionary reports
Read more about factually accurate statements here:
brainly.com/question/1343499
#SPJ11
The giant redwood trees of Muir have an average age of 800 to 900 years, while it's height is of 100 and 150 metres.
<span>The Americans, because they kicked the British out of North America.
Hope this helps.
</span>
