1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mr_godi [17]
3 years ago
13

One of the Federalist concerns before Jefferson was elected President was that he would bring about a “reign of terror” to the U

nited States. Did Jefferson bring a “reign of terror”? Why or Why not?
Social Studies
1 answer:
fiasKO [112]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Strictly speaking, Jefferson did not enact a reign of terror as happened in the French Revolution against the noble class.  There were many controversies during the period that Jefferson was president and there were many who held different views than his.

Explanation:

The "reign of terror" is in reference to Jefferson's very public and vocal support of the French Revolution. The term "reign of terror" refers to the violence that was waged against elites and even the king and queen during the French Revolution.  Jefferson was inspired by the principles of the revolution because he felt radical change was necessary to change the old monarchical regimes of Europe. The Federalists did not like this prospect because they wanted some continuity to the past -- they were in favor of a stronger central government and central bank and maintaining strong ties to England because of trade. Jefferson believed that the national government’s authority should be limited to just the powers expressly granted by the U.S. Constitution. More power should go to the states in the Democratic-Republican view.

Jefferson did not bring a reign of terror in the strict sense as America's revolution had already been won. But he was successful in championing the power of the individual states rather than a strong central government and the Federalists lost influence. Jefferson was also controversial in his persecution of his former vice president Aaron Burr and tensions with Chief Justice John Marshall who ruled there was no evidence of treason on the part of Burr despite the efforts Jefferson made to have him apprehended.  

You might be interested in
How could the words social, power, situational, generational, global, physical, and resources each be connected to poverty.
gizmo_the_mogwai [7]

Answer:

The different amounts of influence in each field can determine the amount of money a country gets through exports and imports. The economy is also determined by the amount of influence. Poverty is related to the economy because if the economy is poor, the chances of being in poverty are very high.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Heterosexual women are most likely to be sexually attracted to men who seem
fiasKO [112]

The answer that will be best to complete the sentence is that they are likely to be attracted to men who are affluent or mature enough as this is the standards that most women look out for as these are the characteristics that likely made them to be sexually attracted to.

5 0
3 years ago
The citizens of a country support the idea that their government should make prayer in schools compulsory but should not ask the
Nady [450]

Answer:

The answer is conservatism.

Explanation:

Conservatism refers to a political and social philosophy that tries to promote traditional social institutions that have a relationship with culture as well as civilization. The main principles concerning conservatism include tradition, organic society, hierarchy, among others.

Conservatives try to keep some institutions like religion, parliamentary government, as well as property rights to accentuate aspects like social stability and continuity.  

5 0
3 years ago
Which features characterize the Piedmont region?
sergey [27]

Answer:

Its geology is complex, with numerous rock formations of different materials and ages intermingled with one another.

3 0
2 years ago
Plz help!
insens350 [35]
The Supreme Court decision in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966) required (for the first time) that someone accused of a crime be informed of his or her constitutional rights prior to interrogation. This protected the rights of the accused, or the defendant, in two new ways: 1) It educated the person about relevant constitutional rights; and 2) It inhibited law enforcement officials from infringing those rights by applying the Exclusionary Rule to any testimony/incriminating statements the defendant made unless he intentionally waived his rights.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How can a cyclist minimize friction as he or she rides? A. by increasing the weight of the bike B. by increasing the tread on hi
    15·2 answers
  • While holding your instruction permit you may practice driving with any licensed adult ____ years of age or older?
    12·1 answer
  • Emme selectively attends to and better recalls emotionally positive over negative information. Emme has the ability to maximize
    15·1 answer
  • Jonas is an elderly person living in poverty in rural Georgia. He is more likely to benefit from a redistribution policy that __
    7·1 answer
  • You may do a study of college wrestling and use your experience as a student-athlete to access wrestling spaces, athletes, and c
    6·1 answer
  • 4. Drawing Conclusions Why do you think the cartoonist called this cartoon "Fun with Economic Relativity"
    6·1 answer
  • A major failing of the United States under the Articles of Confederation was its
    12·2 answers
  • que juicios morales o de el entendimiento deben ser considerarlos para determinar la moral o no de el ser humano​
    9·1 answer
  • When being pulled over by law enforcement, the first thing you should do is
    10·1 answer
  • A chart showing the amount of rain each month in a region is an example
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!