This would be the opportunity cost: the cost on missing out on different opportunities once one opportunity is chosen. So if you choose A over B, the opportunity cost is the gain you could have had if you'd chosen B (even if you anyway couldn't have chosen both in the first place!)
The foreign sector influences how goods or services move between firms and households: This is not the answer because as seen in the chart, the movement of goods and services is determined by how households and firms trade them.
The foreign sector influences how imports and exports move between firms and households: This is not the answer because imports and exports are determined by the demand of households and firms, the foreign sector has nothing to do with the desires of a different country.
The foreign sector influences how factors of production move between firms and households: This is the answer because globalization and in this case the foreign sector affect the national production of goods and services, in this case when the foreign sector is open to trade with other countries the use of national factors of production will be affected because goods and services are being found elsewhere.
In this case, if for example a country produces rice and it starts demanding more rice from a different country, the situation of the rice producers will change and the result would be less workforce, lower wages and so on.
Answer:
D. Harvard "Tastes, Ties, and Time (t-3)" study (2006-2009)" study
Explanation:
In 2006, Harvard conduct a (t-3) study that gains popularity. It was a Face-book study that plays with your emotions. This study doesn't share the mood manipulation which unsettled many of the users. It is a good example of social data is always murky and study themselves is completely creepy. In this study, the researcher collects the data without informed consent of objects throughout the data verse network.
I am pretty sure it is C. Glacier melting
Because Sedimentation I don't think will contribute to that
