Hello there,
Individual wealth is not taken into account, so it's a poor indication of prosperity in general. They are doing this to measure quality.
Hope this helps.
~Jurgen
Answer:
Montesquieu called the idea of dividing government power into three branches the "separation of powers." He thought it most important to create separate branches of government with equal but different powers. That way, the government would avoid placing too much power with one individual or group of individuals.
She briefly returned Roman Catholicism to England, and for five years of her reign remained remembered as Bloody Mary for persecuting Protestants.
Explanation:
- In January 1554, there was a Protestant rebellion led by Thomas White that Jane Gray wanted to return to the throne. Jane and her husband Dudley, along with his brothers, have been charged with treason and conspiracy against Mary.
- They were tried in London on November 13, 1553. All the accused were found guilty and sentenced to death. According to the verdict, Jane should have either been burned alive on the Tower Hill or beheaded in the Tower of London, as Mary wished. Jane and Guildford were executed on February 12, 1554.
- Already in January 1554, just six months after Mary was crowned, all important Protestant clergymen fled to German lands to escape the persecution of married clergy. In March, she ordered all bishops to remove married priests.
- Parliament met in April and agreed with Mary's decision to establish laws punishing heretics, provided she forgets about returning the land to the monasteries. The Catholic Church, and the legal and religious consequences of her half-brother's rule. She sought to restore the Church of England to the Roman Catholic Church.
- To this end, Parliament repealed all Edward VI laws, and persecuted the protagonists of the previous Protestant government by all means. About three hundred of them were executed by burning at the stake. The first executor was John Rogers, the man who translated the Bible into English, and among those executed was Thomas Cranmer, a priest who arranged for the annulment of the marriage of Mary's parents.
Learn more on Mary I on
brainly.com/question/2456160
brainly.com/question/10100482
brainly.com/question/2681795
#learnwithBrainly
As I understand it, Laissez-faire ideology maintains that the "free market" is the best way to determine what businesses can and should do. This means that businesses, in competition with one another, should be free to determine their paths free from any government rules or regulations. The belief is that the competition among various businesses will ultimately result in the best outcomes for society in general - Adam Smith's "invisible hand". As part of this philosophy, workers should also be free to compete with each other and choose to work wherever they wish and this process will also result in the best results for the workers as well.
However, isn't there a huge assumption in this philosophy? Doesn't the whole justification of this belief depends on the condition that there is perfect competition and that any company and any worker have the equal ability to compete with one another?
What if there is no perfect competition? What if some companies have advantages - due to any of a whole array of reasons - that place them in a non-competitive position vis a vis their competitors? Without perfect competition then other companies are not necessarily able to compete with other companies that have certain advantages. If such a situation exists, then advantaged companies may have the ability to pursue a course that results in their private benefit, but not necessarily to the benefit of society as a whole. The same would apply to workers in that reduced competition among companies would result in decreased leverage for potential employees.
To recap, if the Laissez-faire ideology maintains the best economic policy for society as a whole, and it depends on there being perfect competition on an ongoing basis with minimal government intervention, doesn't it fall apart if there is less than the perfect competition?
The Code of Hammurabi, written in cuneiform. This promoted literacy in society. King Hammurabi ruled Babylonia from 1792-1750 BCE. Claiming that he received laws from the sun god, Shamash, Hammurabi declared a set of 282 laws known as Hammurabi's Code. These laws deal with all aspects of everyday life, and it describes both major and minor offenses and their punishments. However, the rich and poor, men and women, and elites and commoners were treated differently under the law. This deepened the social hierarchy and distinctions between classes and genders, which soon became normal and accepted in society. These laws also influenced the need for one, powerful leader. It used the political power to generate bonds between the people of different races and backgrounds. The code also unified, consolidated, and secured the empire by setting a standard for moral values, religion, class structure, and gender relationships.
