The mountainous topography of the Greek peninsula resulted in the isolation of these two city-states.
Athens developed a system that valued philosophy and active political involvement by its citizens in an early form of democracy. (Note that it wasn't full democracy as we'd think of it today, as those who had a political voice were free men, not women or slaves.)
Sparta developed a militaristic system that valued physical training and military service, as well as a strict loyalty to the state.
Women were looked at as a cause of sin, even though the doctrine said they were viewed as equal. Many went into monasteries to prove their worth, devotion, virtue and to ensure the survival of their families and their souls. They were treated as were treated as inferior to men.
The difference lies in interpreting the two sides of the conflict. McPherson saw the war as the war between the evil South and the good North. He was focused on the abolition of slavery and their integration into the society as free people. Horwitz on the other hand saw South not as evil but as a faction which went to war to protect its economic interests.
The correct answer is D) Dualism describes like as a constant struggle between good and evil.
<em>The statement that explains the Zoroastrianism concept of dualism is “Dualism describes like as a constant struggle between good and evil.”
</em>
Zoroastrianism considers that existence is divided by the presence of two opposites: good and evil. In the Cosmos, this division in exemplified by the opposing forces in the Universe. In Moral, the division in exemplified by opposing forces in the human mind. Life, for philosopher Zoroaster, was a constant struggle between doing the right thing –good- and the presence of the wrong thing or evil.
The other options of the questions were a) Dualism explains the relationship between the God of Judaism and Zoroaster. b) Dualism established different societal roles for men and women. c) Dualism explains why people reject the prophet Zoroaster teachings.
Knowing the land they are fighting on better
Very close to resources when British are far away
The use of guerrilla warfare
Overconfident British generals underestimating the patriots
The patriots were usually passionate about their beliefs about the war, when the British were just fighting because they had to, affected the outcome because patriots faught harder
