Answer:
Yes.
Explanation:
Yes, I support Indians because this banning of sati system is link with their religion which is intolerable for the Indians so they revolt against British government. In my opinion, this banning of Sati system is a good decision taken by the British government but this decision is greatly impacted the religious belief of Hindus. So we can conclude that Indians were right in their action because no one tolerate disturbance or amendments in their religion.
Poverty is is not natural. It is something that manifested it self as we humans established ourselves in certain areas that would be called countries/ cities. With that development came others like wealth and poverty.
I feel like I did it wrong.
Answer:
See explanations
Explanation:
According to a functionalist perspective, differences in power, wealth, and other rewards within the social structure are justified, because they motivate the most qualified people to exercise their talents in the most important jobs.
Society is unequally structured because of people’s inherent inequality in functional importance.
A problem with this view is that it is difficult to determine the functional importance of any job.
Another problem with this view is that it assumes that the current system of stratification is fair and rational, which is not always the case.
Key Terms
social stratification: The hierarchical arrangement of social classes, or castes, within a society.
functional importance: The degree to which a job is unique and requires skill