Answer:
(1) Solicitation and manslaughter
2) Could be charges as an accomplice and manslaughter
Explanation: the following are crimes Dan can be charged with
(A) Solicitation: the offense that consists of a person inducing another to commit a crime the specific intent that the person solicited commit the crime .Dan incited Ann in committing crime asking her help for getting cyanide which she refused initially but eventually agreed.
(B) Manslaughter Dan took the law into his hands by trying to kill the bandit and eventually killed another.
Ann got involved by agreeing to buy the cyanide which makes her a crime accomplice.
In defense, Dan could say it was an accident since there was no intent or his lawyer can make sure they prove that the prosecution does not have enough evidence
<span>The minority leader.
The Minority Leader right now is Nancy Pelosi, of the United States House of Representatives serves as floor leader of the opposition party, and is the counterpart to the Majority Leader. different from the Majority Leader, the Minority Leader is on the ballot for Speaker of the House during the convening of the Congress.</span>
The answer is b. Civil court because it isn’t a criminal matter so they wouldn’t go to criminal court meaning it can’t be a they are neighbors not family members so they wouldn’t go to family court so it isn’t c and it isn’t d because in order to go to appeals court you have to have already gone to court and the prompt does not state that they are appealing the verdict of a previous court case
Utilitarianism and consequentialism more broadly are ethical theories that __________. have few concrete applications, have almost no critics or challengers, use outdated forms of reasoning
The answer is not supplied in the choices you gave. The answer is "have many variations". Utilitarianism and consequentialism more broadly are ethical theories that have many variations.
