He outlined his goals of a thrifty government and the support of states to better protect their freedoms than a large federal body.
The answer is a decomposer
Answer:
D. shame and doubt
Explanation:
Shame and doubt: In psychology, the term "shame and doubt" is described as a part of the second stage i.e, "autonomy versus shame & doubt" and falls in the psychosocial development theory which was proposed by Erik Erikson. This stage generally starts between eighteen months of a child's life and lasts through two to three years of age and is focused on establishing a sense of "self-control". A child tries to be independent and if he or she isn't able to do so then he or she will experience "shame and doubt".
In the question above, Erikson would say that McKenzie is likely to develop a sense of shame and doubt.
The last one, the lovers find it hard to determine whether they are asleep or awake.
Answer:
The statement which is the best argument against Social Darwinism is:
B. A good work ethic can eliminate a lot of the disadvantages of poverty.
Explanation:
Social Darwinism is a philosophy that incorporates notions taken from Darwinism, applying them to sciences such as sociology and economics. As we know, <u>Darwinism is based on the idea of "survival of the fittest". Therefore, Social Darwinism explains differences in status, wealth, and success by stating that those who have those things are better than those who do not. In other words, if someone is poor or unsuccessful, that means that person is not "evolved" enough.</u>
The problem with Social Darwinism is that is justifies discrimination and imperialism. It places the blame on those who are actually suffering the consequences of a broken and unfair system. With that in mind, we can easily eliminate options A and C, since they agree with Social Darwinism. Option D can also be eliminated because it merely states a fact that is true, but does not refute Social Darwinism.<u> Letter B is the best option. It argues that there is a way to eliminate many of the disadvantages, that is, it shows the problem with the system, refuting Social Darwinism.</u>
