Answer:
C
Explanation:
A farmer would want to look at the economic status of the US because his goal is to sell as much wheat as possible and make the most profit. If he pays no attention to the economy and there's a recession but he still sells his wheat at the normal price, people whose stocks are going down and who are losing money will be unable to, and unwilling to, pay the price. Thus, the farmer must inspect the changing economic statuses of the US to determine the best and most effective way to market out his wheat to the public.
Changes in US racial patterns have no impact on the marketing of the farmer's wheat, so A is incorrect.
The number of births per year is also irrelevant, as is the general population growth numbers because these do not affect the way the farmer will market his crops, so B and D are incorrect.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
a) yes
b) no
c) yes
d) no
Explanation:
a) if the A/R balance grow higher than the sales is an indicator that our collection cycle increase thus, customer extend their financiation providing less cash flow
b) this is the opposite as (a) here we extend our financing agaist our suppliers. The payment cycle increases thus, decreasing the overall cash demand
c) If the assets were puirchased on cahs a huge amount was used alrady affecting the liquidity of the company.
If the company finance the purchase of the long term assets, in the future the company will have to dedicate a portion of their future cahs flow to pay up interest and principal which is what we should analize; wether or not the company will have difficulties in the future and the answer is yesin both scenarios.
d) no. It will not, as marketable securities are generally short-term and easily converted into cash in the short term. They do not generate cash flow problems in the long run as the company can sale them anytime to obtain cash.
Answer:
The answer is: the real gain in real GDP between 2010 and 2000 is 18.34%
Explanation:
First we have to determine the real GDP using the GDP deflator.
GDP deflator = (nominal GDP / real GDP) x 100
For year 2000:
24 = ($672 billion / real GDP ) x 100
2,400 = $672 billion / real GDP
real GDP = $0.28 billion
For year 2010:
51 = ($1,690 billion / real GDP ) x 100
5,100 = $1,690 billion / real GDP
real GDP = $0.331 billion
To calculate the real gain between real GDP from year 2000 to year 2010, we divide real GDP 2010 over real GDP 2000 and subtract 1:
($0.331 billion / $0.28 billion) -1 = 0.1834 x 100% = 18.34%
The <u>law of increasing relative cost </u>states that the opportunity cost of producing a good always rises as one produces more of it.
According to the law of increasing costs, production eventually loses efficiency as it grows. The labor expenses for each additional item will increase, for instance, if increased production requires overtime work from your workforce.
Opportunity cost is the value of other commodities or services you must forgo in order to get your desired item. The term "cost" as used by economists often refers to opportunity cost. Cost is frequently mentioned in conversations or on the news.
According to the law of increasing opportunity cost, the cost of manufacturing the next unit rises as you keep up with the production of a given good.
Find more about opportunity cost
brainly.com/question/24229740
#SPJ4
Answer:
Option B
Explanation:
Both Nadia and Samantha have insured their cars and willing to pay $100 over the expected loss for insurance. If the car is stolen the company would pay expected loss and would earn nothing and if the car is not stolen the company would not be liable for any loss and would earn $200, Therefore the company would earn between $0 and $200.
