1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
FromTheMoon [43]
3 years ago
9

Did Egyptians choose to live next to a desert because they loved the heat.

History
2 answers:
kari74 [83]3 years ago
5 0

No. The Egyptians choose to live next to heat because they basically had to. That was probably the first land they found. That might be the reason why they lived in the desert.

max2010maxim [7]3 years ago
3 0

It might have been so

You might be interested in
16. In 2003 voters in the state of California decided to remove their governor through an official election in a non election ye
tatuchka [14]

Answer:

Recall Election

Explanation:

i'm californian and I know about it, we also just had another one not to long ago but it failed. let me know if this isnt right and I'll follow up in comments.

6 0
2 years ago
As Indians learned more about the seasonal winds they did all of the following
MaRussiya [10]

Answer:

2 used the wind to travel to North America

3 0
3 years ago
Do you think Adam Smith or Karl Marx would be more supportive of globalization? Why?
Anestetic [448]
I think that Adam Smith would be more supportive of globalization of multinational corporations since his major work, the Wealth of Nations dealt with the workings of the capitalist system and supported it. I think that Karl Marx would be strongly opposed to the control that the multi-nationals have over their neo-colonies but at the same time would applaud the way that globalization has developed solidarity between the working class of the different countries such as between the major capitalist countries and the so-called Third World countries. 
3 0
3 years ago
Who founded the university of Virginia?
Step2247 [10]

Answer:

Thomas Jefferson

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
What was the significance, other than the obvious harm to US forces, of the terror attack on the USS Cole in 2000?.
labwork [276]
The significance of the attack on the USS Cole in 2000 was that it changed the rules of engagement for US ships, which can now fire upon approaching vessels without captain approval.
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • I need the answer right away <br><br> I suck at maps what is the answer I do K12
    6·2 answers
  • Which of these companies is not a company that help the growth of science and technology in Texas
    5·1 answer
  • How is Wren's plan for St. Paul's Cathedral similar to Maderno's plan for the new St. Peter's in Rome?
    15·1 answer
  • Which statement best summarizes the role citizens play in a democracy
    12·1 answer
  • How did science influence Muslim art and architecture?
    9·1 answer
  • Which primary source document would give you insight into how the Great Chicago Fire affected working-class families?
    14·1 answer
  • How did Juan Seguin help Texas gain independence?
    7·1 answer
  • In a market economy, who decides how resources are used and distributed?
    9·2 answers
  • How might the Nazi treatment of European Jews affected everyone else?
    5·1 answer
  • What is travel pattern
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!