Answer:
The correct answer is that the valuation would decrease total assets and stockholders’ equity by $101.00
Explanation:
Item Cost Market price Impact
Quantity
1 220 $ 4.40 $ 4.60 no impact as cost is lower
2 130 $ 6.20 $ 6.00 ($6.20-$6.00)*
130=$26
3 100 $ 10.00 $ 9.25 ($10-$9.25)*100 =$75
4 25 $ 20.50 $ 25.00 No impact as cost is lower
The total reduction in the value of inventory as a result of adopting the lower of cost or market price valuation is $101 ($75+$26),hence decreases total assets by $101 and the stockholders' equity(retained earnings which is a component of stockholders' equity ) by the same amount
Answer:
The correct answer is: <u>Is it balanced?</u>
Explanation:
This question based on ethics would be the most appropriate to assess these situations. Because when you confront your friend that it would not be fair and ethical for him to share an article written by him to be used as if you had written it, he responds to you with behavior that you consider unethical, but in these situations there is no balance comparison, as they are different situations.
Ethical issues seek to solve conflicting problems and dilemmas.
Answer:
The net income will increase by $6,712 if the subcomponent is purchased.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Swifty Corporation incurs the following costs to produce 9900 units of a subcomponent:
Direct materials $8316
Direct labor 11187
Variable overhead 12474
Fixed overhead 16200
Total cost= $48,177
An outside supplier has offered to sell Swifty the subcomponent for $2.85 a unit.
Swifty could avoid $3000 of fixed overhead by accepting the offer.
We need to calculate the total cost of buying the subcomponent:
Buy:
Total cost= 9,900*2.85 + (16,200 - 3,000)= $41,415
The net income will increase by $6,712 if the subcomponent is purchased.
Being smart and being decisive.
