<span>Segregation in the South was intended to keep African Americans at a lower status as white Americans. It meant that white Americans and African Americans used different restrooms, ate at different restaurants, etc. Even churches were segregated and kept African Americans in subordination.</span>
When Jackson vacated office in March 1837, he left his mark on presidency and forever changed the course of American history. Through his actions and tenure as president, Jackson squarely set the executive branch on an equal footing with congress in terms of power and ability to shape law and government policies
Answer:
There was great wealth in the South, but it was primarily tied up in the slave economy. In 1860, the economic value of slaves in the United States exceeded the invested value of all of the nation's railroads, factories, and banks combined. On the eve of the Civil War, cotton prices were at an all-time high.
Explanation:
The Civil War benefited the Northern economy, but it left the Southern economy in absolutely terrible condition. ... The North had a more industrialized economy and therefore benefited from the railroad boom and the manufacturing of wartime products.
Answer:
Georgia, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on March 3, 1832, held (5–1) that the states did not have the right to impose regulations on Native American land. Andrew Jackson refused to enforce the ruling, the decision helped form the basis for most subsequent law in the United States regarding Native Americans. Georgia, 31 U.S. (6 Pet.) 515 (1832), was a landmark case in which the United States Supreme Court vacated the conviction of Samuel Worcester and held that the Georgia criminal statute that prohibited non-Native Americans from being present on Native American lands without a license from the state was unconstitutional.Worcester's decision was important in terms of the Native American rights because he was there to help the Native Americans not be scared of the Supreme Court. That they can fight and stay where they are. In an opinion delivered by Chief Justice John Marshall, the Court held that the Georgia act, under which Worcester was prosecuted, violated the Constitution, treaties, and laws of the United States.
Explanation:
