1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Akimi4 [234]
3 years ago
8

Which is an example of how the court can “invalidate acts and executive actions that the justices agree exceed the authority gra

nted to government officials”?
Group of answer choices

Dred Scott v. Sanford - denied citizenship and basic rights to all African Americans

Plessy v. Ferguson - allowed "separate but equal" racially segregated facilities.

Marbury v Madison – established Judicial Review for Presidential acts

Korematsu v. U.S. - upheld Japanese internment camps
Law
1 answer:
ch4aika [34]3 years ago
4 0

Answer: Marbury v Madison - established judicial review for presidential acts

Explanation: C is the answer

You might be interested in
Sayid is a corrections officer in the county jail. What might be one
Stolb23 [73]

The correct answer is B: accompanying inmates to and from court.

3 0
3 years ago
Read the excerpt from a folktale.
agasfer [191]

Answer:

Watch out for hunters’ nets in the jungle. JK!

right answer: When we help others, we help ourselves.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
What is a precipitin test? What is it used for?
Thepotemich [5.8K]

Answer:

it's a test used in criminology for determining the human or other source of a bloodstain.

The precipitin test identifies whether or not blood found on a crime scene is human or another species. Knowing the origin of the blood helps the forensic lab determine whose blood it is. The precipitin test can be preformed directly at the crime scene, this way you do not have to send false samples to the laboratory.

The precipitin test measures the response from the immune system of another animal by making anti-human antibodies to protect from human blood proteins.

5 0
2 years ago
Locke’s purpose in examining the “state of Nature”is
NNADVOKAT [17]

Answer:

D)To show why the state of nature is inadequate for determining what our fundamental rights should be.

Explanation:

John Locke, an English philosopher, widely referred to as Father of Liberalism, examines the "State of Nature" for the purpose of showing why the state of nature is inadequate for determining what our fundamental rights should be.

According to him, each individual in a society has a natural right to protect his or her own life, liberty, and property and at the same time, each individual has a natural right to seek for compensation for any wrongful injury to his or her natural rights; life, liberty, or property which has been inflicted by other individuals.

However, Locke, believed that, since 'state of nature' is more or less a state of insecurity, that is, each individual is not secured to possible infringement of his or her natural rights by other individuals. Hence, the needs to create a civil government, whose purpose is to protect the natural rights, freedom and well-being of all members of society.

This is because, in a "state of nature" there is no legislative or judicial authority that members of the society can seek for help in order to protect their natural rights, such as lives, liberty, or property. But to ensure there is security and protection to individuals natural right, there is need for a civil government, with a judicial authority whose purpose is to resolve disputes fairly and equitably.

7 0
3 years ago
Is he green or red............
Ahat [919]

Answer:

green

Explanation:

why

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which government function would most likely be provided by County government?
    7·1 answer
  • What is a lawsuit????
    7·1 answer
  • What most accurately captures a criticism about the requirement to take bar examinations in order to become a licensed lawyer? a
    6·2 answers
  • What's your favorite billie eilish song ? mine is no time to die for now.​
    5·2 answers
  • What is the difference between public forum and private property?
    6·1 answer
  • Expliquen la siguiente frase: "La igualdad ante la ley no necesariamente garantiza igualdad de derechos para todas las personas
    14·1 answer
  • What would happen if organ systems failed to work together?
    9·2 answers
  • How does Medicare for All promote equality in our health care system? Please provide evidence to support how it does.
    11·1 answer
  • Interest groups (4 points)
    5·2 answers
  • Xác định các bộ phận giả định, quy định, chế tài trong các điều luật sau:
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!