Answer:
That sounds like the old Keynesian idea made popular during Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal: Cut taxes and increase government spending to “prime the pump” during a recession; raise taxes and reduce spending to slow down an “overheated” economy. Keynesianism seemed to have been finally laid to rest in the 1980s when President Ronald Reagan argued for a tax cut on supply‐side grounds, and even liberal economists now agree that such fine‐tuning has little effect on the economy.
Explanation:
1. In a free country, money belongs to the people who earn it. The most fundamental reason to cut taxes is an understanding that wealth doesn’t just happen, it has to be produced. And those who produce it have a right to keep it. We may agree to give up a portion of the wealth we create in order to pay for such public goods as national defense and a system of justice. But we don’t give the government an unlimited claim on our money to use as it sees fit.
Only thing I can think of is ivory. They do produce it, it is exported but that's illegal...
The public approved of Martin Van Buren because he was sticking policies similar to Andrew Jackson, the previous president. Jackson also helped campaign Buren. Buren supported lower tariffs while his opponent, the Whig Party, did not. He also advocated free trade and set up system of bonds for the national debt.
It’s D. Because is talking about your goals and leader
