Ask question

Ask question

All categories

3 years ago

15

to determine the number of trout in a lake a lake a conservationist catches 124 trout tag them and throws them back into the lak

e later 44 trout are called 11 of them are tagged how many trout would the conservationist expect to be in the lake

1 answer:

natali 33 [55]3 years ago

8 0

Answer: 25

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in

First answer is brainlyist

horsena [70]

3

Step-by-step explanation:

<u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u><u>3</u>

5 0

3 years ago

Can Anyone help me with my rsm

Sophie [7]

Answer:

Sure, Where's the picture?

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

Katie is doing an inventory at American Eagle. There is 125 pairs of jeans. 36 pairs of jeans are women's skinny jeans. What per

ZanzabumX [31]

All you have to do is put 36/125. This will get you .288. When rounded to the nearest percent, it is 28%.

3 0

3 years ago

The smallest object visible with your eyes is similar to the width of a piece of hair, which is 1×10−4 meters wide. Using an opt

Sloan [31]

Answer:

B. $5\times10^{2}$

Step-by-step explanation:

We are told that the smallest object visible with our eyes is similar to the width of a piece of hair, which is $1\times 10^{-4}$ meters wide.

Using an optical microscope, we can see items up to $2\times 10^{-7}$ meters wide.

To find the objects we can see with our eyes are how much larger than the objects we can see with an optical microscope, we can set an equation as:

$\frac{\text{The width of the object we can see with our eyes}}{\text{The width of the objects we can see with microscope}}=\frac{1*10^{-4}}{2*10^{-7}}$

Using the exponent rule of quotient $\frac{a^m}{a^n}=a^{m-n}$ we will get,

$\frac{\text{The width of the object we can see with our eyes}}{\text{The width of the objects we can see with microscope}}=\frac{1}{2}*10^{-4-(-7)}$

$\frac{\text{The width of the object we can see with our eyes}}{\text{The width of the objects we can see with microscope}}=0.5*10^{-4+7}$

$\frac{\text{The width of the object we can see with our eyes}}{\text{The width of the objects we can see with microscope}}=0.5*10^{3}$

$\frac{\text{The width of the object we can see with our eyes}}{\text{The width of the objects we can see with microscope}}=0.5*10\times 10^{3-1}$

$\text{The object we can see with our eyes}=5\times10^{2}*\text{The objects we can see with microscope}$

Therefore, the objects we can see with our eyes are $5\times10^{2}$ times larger than the objects we can see with an optical microscope and option B is the correct choice.

3 0

3 years ago

A shipping container is known to hold exactly 1000 ft squared. if the container is measured, which side dimensions would produce

sleet_krkn [62]

c..........................

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers