Answer:
yeah sure what do you want to ch.At about
Explanation:
because i don't really care what we talk abt
Answer:
Number = 1,490
Cost of goods available for sale = $75,200
Explanation:
Computing the number as:
Number = (Beginning inventory + Purchases + Purchases) - Sales
Number = (1,220 + 310 + 270) - 310
Number = 1,800 - 310
Number = 1,490
Computing the cost of goods available for sale as:
Cost of goods available for sale = Total cost of beginning inventory + Total Cost of purchase + Total Cost of purchase
Cost of goods available for sale = $17,600 + $27,900 + $29,700
Cost of goods available for sale = $75,200
Answer:
The resulting CA percentage for the week to the nearest number is 94%
Explanation:
CA refers to Commitment Adherence.
Commitment Adherence (CA) is a way to calculate the reliability of an employee in relation to how much time they put into their work.
Put differently, it is a mathematical comparison between how much time you stated that you were going to work versus the actual amount worked. This concept is prevalent with people who use clock-in and clock-out system to measure productivity.
Step 1
The formula for calculating Commitment Adherence (CA) is:
(Serviced Minutes - Excused Non-Serviced Minutes) / (Posted Minutes + Released Minutes)
When you log out at about 5 minutes early it translates to 83% because each interval is 30 minutes. So 23/30 = 83%
Step 2
There are 8 intervals. 5 of them are 100% each. Thus total intervals for the week equal
(5*100%)+(3*83%) =
7.49 *30 = 224.7
Total number of intervals selected =
8*30 = 240
Therefore commitment adherence = 224.7/240
= 0.94%
Cheers!
Answer:
1) $18,000
2) $0
Explanation:
1) The wage based limits in business applies only to taxpayers with taxable income in excess of $157,500 or excess of $315,000, if it is a joint return.
Now, in this case, Roquan's taxable income which is $100,000 is less than the wage limits of $157,500 earlier stated. This implies that it doesn't qualify for wage-based limits.
Therefore, from business practices, Roquan will likely deduct 20% of the net $90,000 which is $18,000 to serve as deduction for qualified business income.
2) We are told that Roquan's taxable income before the deduction for qualified business income is now $300,000. What this implies is that his law practice would be judged to be a trade business and he would therefore not be eligible for deduction of the qualified business income.
Thus, it's $0.
