1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
maria [59]
3 years ago
5

What would you say about history in the future?

History
1 answer:
nasty-shy [4]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: It tells us what will happen again if we do not learn from the past.

We all need to be informed of slavery, the holocaust, evil leaders and regimes, and man-made environmental disasters so we can avoid having them happen again.

Ignorance of the past is very dangerous.

Intentionally revising history to say there was no holocaust (or to revise other shameful periods in history) is even worse because people won't learn from what they do not believe in.

If we look at how technology builds on itself we can postulate to some extent from the progression where we will be in X number of years. Looking at the history of the automobile, medicine, or any other field, we can make reasonable, educated assumptions.

Some assumptions in medicine, for example, are that we will have unrejected organ replacement therapy, a greatly extended life span and nanotechnology.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
How can you interpret this political cartoon?
Degger [83]

Answer:

I would interpret it as a good promotion for this political party because it is telling the audience that they offer liberty, justice and equality which is something a lot of people want.

7 0
3 years ago
What was the ultimate failure of WWI?
Leni [432]

Answer:

The immediate cause of World War I that made the aforementioned items come into play (alliances, imperialism, militarism, nationalism) was the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary. In June 1914, a Serbian-nationalist terrorist group called the Black Hand sent groups to assassinate the Archduke.

7 0
3 years ago
Why did the majority of events take place in the South?
BaLLatris [955]

Answer:

Mostly what took place in the south was slavery and segregation.

Explanation: Slave owners would have their slaves in the hot sun all day and would beat them if they didn't do what was asked of them. Now segregation is where African Americans and White people couldn't be together they had to be separate. hope this helped :)

5 0
2 years ago
Which of these groups benefited from the Proclamation of 1763?
natta225 [31]

Answer:

d) American colonists

Explanation:

hope this helps!

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who can help me out please
ankoles [38]

Wait it isn't 5! Just a second. It is -15

-4 times 5 is negative 20. When you add 5 to negative 20, it becomes -15

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following terms is used to refer to media outlets that utilize sensationalized headlines and stories to garner inte
    7·2 answers
  • What were the main characteristics of the affluent society of the 1950s?
    13·1 answer
  • In his essay "last words of great men" mark twain quotes the dying words of all of the following except
    11·1 answer
  • How do secondary sources help historians understand the past?
    10·2 answers
  • Which event was most important in the rise of the Republican Party?
    7·1 answer
  • After ________ , the zapatista national liberation army began a revolt against the mexican government.
    9·1 answer
  • Which evidence from the passage best supports Herbert Hoover's claim? Check all that apply. .
    6·1 answer
  • Which leader was not a part of the abolitionist movement?
    11·1 answer
  • Am i correct i will give you brainliest (no unnecessary stuff I will report) if wrong no crown for u
    5·1 answer
  • Read the sentence.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!