1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
maria [59]
3 years ago
5

What would you say about history in the future?

History
1 answer:
nasty-shy [4]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: It tells us what will happen again if we do not learn from the past.

We all need to be informed of slavery, the holocaust, evil leaders and regimes, and man-made environmental disasters so we can avoid having them happen again.

Ignorance of the past is very dangerous.

Intentionally revising history to say there was no holocaust (or to revise other shameful periods in history) is even worse because people won't learn from what they do not believe in.

If we look at how technology builds on itself we can postulate to some extent from the progression where we will be in X number of years. Looking at the history of the automobile, medicine, or any other field, we can make reasonable, educated assumptions.

Some assumptions in medicine, for example, are that we will have unrejected organ replacement therapy, a greatly extended life span and nanotechnology.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Define panic-monger and describe its connotations. How does Stalin's use of the word affect his tone? How does the meaning of th
matrenka [14]
A panic-monger is a man who spreads frenzy and Stalin's utilization of the term makes all the more an unfriendly tone, even against his own particular individuals. The significance of the word changes each time by winding up increasingly threatening in light of the fact that he begins by saying there's no space for freeze mongers, at that point goes ahead to connect them with spies and the foe, at that point, at last, goes ahead to state they'll go on trial for spreading alarm.
7 0
3 years ago
Why did the Japanese policy toward Christans change from acceptance to repression
MrRissso [65]

Answer:

The shogunate began to repress Christians in Japan because they were ignoring or disrespecting traditional customs, getting involved in local politics, and because they were seen as responsible in the 1637 Shimabara Rebellion.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
The Kansas-Nebraska Act did all of the following, except what?
krek1111 [17]

Answer:

I believe the first one I am pretty sure

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
What was the “Napoleonic Code”?:
den301095 [7]

Answer:

The last one in the choices

5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following best describes the contributions of Horace Mann?
Minchanka [31]
Horace Mann was a key figure in ensuring all American children received a proper education.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why does hobbes's version of the social contract give absolute power to a sovereign?
    9·1 answer
  • Where was the first slave that became free from?
    5·1 answer
  • In your opinion, which tax do you think is better a flat or a progressive tax? Why?
    6·2 answers
  • Limiting the frequency of elections could have the following result _____.
    9·1 answer
  • In 1900, 40% of the US labor force worked in agriculture. A hundred years later, in 2000, only 2% worked in agriculture. What is
    9·2 answers
  • How did racism and discrimination lead to the rise of black nationalism?
    15·1 answer
  • Plsss answer its a civics quiz hurrry
    9·1 answer
  • What was one cultural achievement of Alexander the Great?
    6·1 answer
  • Select all the correct answers. In which two ways were the Northeast Woodland Indians and the Southeast Indians similar?
    5·1 answer
  • Pls I need this ASAP
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!