False
Because the predators would have more food if the prey increased
The predominant hypothesis for why the animals needed some 3 billion years to evolve after the life first appeared on the planet is that the conditions were not right for them to appear.
The life on Earth has appeared much earlier that what we normally assume, and also it has not been evolving very quickly, but instead it has been a very slow and gradual process. The reason for that is that the living conditions on the Earth were much different than what are they now, or anytime from the Cambrian period until the present.
The surface was still pretty hot, and there was intense volcanic activity. The composition of the atmosphere was not suitable for animals to appear at all, and in fact it would have been toxic for them. The water too had chemicals in it that were not providing the right conditions for animals to evolve. It was only after the plants started to appear and managed to make lot of changes in the water, atmosphere, and land, than the animals were able to evolve and develop.
A phenotype is a physical characteristic which is visible. Hence when the resulting combinations have two dominant alleles or even one dominant allele, the dominant characteristic is exhibited. The recessive characteristic is exhibited only when both the alleles are recessive.
To find the ratio of phenotypes, we need to place the genotype of the father and mother in a grid form ( attached grid figure)
Here we have two Ff phenotypes which is dominant and two ff phenotypes which is recessive
Hence the ratio is 2:2 or 1:1
