1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
____ [38]
3 years ago
8

How many years are between 100 bce & 100 ce? please provide an explanation too

History
1 answer:
aev [14]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

199 years

Explanation:

The BCE is known as Before the Common Era, while CE means Common Era. And because the year is counted downwards, 100 BCE to CE is expected to be 100 years. However, because there is no 0 CE, hence that would be 99 years.

Also, adding the next 100 CE years, that will make the total sum of 199 years.

In other words, The calculation is 100 BCE + 100 CE, which equals 200 years. However, there is a need to adjust for the absence of year 0. This is done by subtracting 1 from the answer, hence, 200 minus 1 is 199.

You might be interested in
Who was the last byzantine emperor?
Dmitrij [34]

Answer:

Constantine XI Palaeologus

Explanation:

that's my answer please

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Analyze the impact and importance of the initiative as a vehicle for political participation and as a means of achieving politic
irina [24]

Answer and Explanation:

The initiative allows citizens to actively participate in the political process that manages the country. This allows social changes to be established based on the precepts and needs of the population that is directly affected by them.

This all promotes an active politicization of the entire population that can better inspect, charge and understand the processes that are happening, in addition the initiative allows the population to manage economic resources and maintain a conscious political body and without shirking their responsibilities.

7 0
3 years ago
Does the greco-roman legal tradition continue to have a strongly positive influence on modern law and society?
Lesechka [4]
The answer is yes. The Greco-Roman legal tradition continue to have a strong positive influence on modern law and society. They greatly influenced the modern world with the creation of laws, development of democratic government practices, influences in languages, literature, arts, infrastructure, and city planning.
5 0
3 years ago
What would the world look like now if the 13 colonies wasn't rebelled
nikklg [1K]
There wouldn't be a USA, and...

the Indians would still have pretty much all of the Middle-west of the USA.
Hawaii would still be under their kings/queens
Alaska would still be part of russia
China would pretty much never had any technological progress (they isolated themselves)
Japan would still be going around with pretty much katanas.

etc etc

if you want more i can give you more (if you want information on why one is on the list, post it in the comments)

hope this helps
7 0
4 years ago
What action was an economic cause of increased tension between the north and south
gavmur [86]

In a nutshell, the protective tariffs were responsible for the development of the economy in the north but had the opposite impact in the south where they had the opposite effect.

This is further explained below.

<h3>What action was an economic cause of increased tension between the north and south?</h3>

Generally, One of the economic factors that contributed to the escalating tensions between the North and the South was the protective tariff. In terms of its economy, the North had developed into an industrialized region and had a large number of enterprises. On the other hand, the South maintained a significant reliance on agricultural production.

To assist the Northern Industries, high protective tariffs were imposed on commodities imported from other countries. Because of this, additional goods had to be purchased from northern vendors.

The South was forced to pay a higher price for the items that they imported from Europe as a result of this tariff, which benefited the North but put a bigger burden on the South.

To summarize, the protective tariffs contributed to the expansion of the economy in the north while having the opposite effect in the south.

Read more about the economy

brainly.com/question/2421251

#SPJ1

CQ

Which of these measures contributed to an increase in the economic tensions that existed between the North and the South?

Dred Scott decision

Protective levies on imports

Bleeding Kansas

The election of Lincoln

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • In your opinion, what was the greatest challenge facing the United States in the 1960s? How did it confront this challenge?
    11·1 answer
  • While researching a thesis paper on Ronald regains presidency you discover multiple resources that support your argument which r
    5·1 answer
  • Which of these examples best describes the government and individual responsibilities of a welfare state? High individual income
    9·2 answers
  • How did members of Parliament respond to James II's attempts to enlarge his army and support Catholics?
    14·2 answers
  • What do you attribute Nixon’s victory in the 1968 election?
    14·1 answer
  • The bill of rights were based off of
    13·1 answer
  • Why did the Soviet Union mistrust the United States and Britain during World War II?
    9·1 answer
  • The Inca Empire was located in what is now?
    11·1 answer
  • When I’m the imposter in among us....
    14·2 answers
  • Do you think that increased globalization is inevitable? Explain
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!