Answer:
For free market economy, we can explain it in 3 expects. First, because households are the 'owners' of productive resources, firms have to pay them for their resources in the resource market, they can produce everything they want, the type and amount of products are determined by every individual firms, but they should produce the goods and service that other companies or household want, and can make the maximum profits, more profits, more motive for the producers. Prices are determined by householders.
While For the centrally planned economy, (it is also called command economy), all the resources (land, labour and capital) in the market are allocated by government, and it makes all the productive decisions, including price determination, so, the centrally planned economy is a government-controlled economic situation. First, a centrally planned economy may choose to produce whatever the government decides is most crucial to meeting society's needs, the government should provide services and goods that can cater to the people's need. Like in the 19th and 20th centuries period, in China, Mao Zedong realized that China is under a low level of heavy industry, so he decided to develop it first, then the light industry, this decision is sensible and realistic.
I believe it was because the government was afraid that they might be spies for Japan, so they thought it was safer to keep them in one place so it would be easier to keep an eye on them. It also stemmed from racism due to the attack on Pearl Harbor and the U.S. fighting against the Japanese in the Pacific.
They were able to grow, enough food and Romans invited Germanic farmers to grow crops on Roman lands that could be an example
I HOPE THIS HELPED
Answer:
The basic idea of cinfusianalism is that emperors have a right to rule granted by heaven based on their ability to provide good governance, and this was prevalent in China. ... As per the Divine Right of Kings, only God can judge whether the king was fit to rule or not.
That statement IS arguable because not everyone would agree and also NOT defensible since theres no proof to back it up with, so the answer would be (D)
