1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Assoli18 [71]
3 years ago
12

You think to escape my question!!!!!

Law
1 answer:
Arisa [49]3 years ago
5 0

have a nice day haha

You might be interested in
6. How was the decision in Stanford v. Kentucky changed? Be sure to provide the name and a brief description of the congressiona
MArishka [77]

Stanford v. Kentucky, was a United States Supreme Court case in the year 1989 that sanctioned the imposition of the death penalty on offenders who were at least 16 years of age at the time of the crime.

The Supreme Court in the year 2005,while handling the Roper v. Simmons' case ruled that the death penalty is a disproportionate punishment for juveniles, and thus it violates the Eighth Amendment to impose a death sentence on a youthful murderer who committed the crime before age 18.

Christopher Simmons, who was 17 at the time, committed a crime that led to a death sentence.

The Court said that the society views juveniles as categorically less culpable than the average criminal. The supreme court argued than a man only becomes culpable of any criminal act when he reaches the age of 18, and claimed at imposing a death penalty on a young child who is not old enough to take charge of his own actions is wrong.

The supreme court claimed that a juvenile who committed a heinous crime can be made to forfeit his fundamental rights rather than being murdered.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Statutory law is to legislative bodies as common law is to Group of answer choices rulemaking. agencies. courts. administrative
Mice21 [21]

Statutory law is to legislative bodies as common law is to Courts.

Statutory law- Statutory law is the kind of law that is made by the legislature of the country. These laws are codified by the legislature(Senate and House of Representatives). The legislature has exclusive power to make this law. The court generally gives decisions on the basis of statutory law but the court cannot make the statutory law.

Common laws- These are the laws that result from judicial activism. From time to time the judiciary of a country passes judgments that become binding on everyone to follow. Common law comes into existence through two methods:

  1. When the judiciary gives fresh judgment in any case
  2. When the judiciary interprets the law or bill.

to learn more about types of law click on the link brainly.com/question/493036

#SPJ4

7 0
2 years ago
I used to be in a speech and debate class if anyone wants to help me practice debating I am here.
kherson [118]

This probably is not quite what you're looking for, but I have listed debating techniques:

Judges generally score the speakers looking at this criteria:

Content / Matter - What the debaters say, their arguments and evidence, the relevance of their arguments.

Style / Manner - How the debaters speak, including the language and tone used.

Strategy / Method - The structure of the speech, the clarity and responding to other's arguments.

SKILLS:

Your points must be relevant to the topic.

Provide evidence whenever you can and not your personal opinion.

You must put aside your personal views and remain objective when you debate so your argument remains logical. You can be passionate about a topic but interest can turn into aggression and passion can turn into upset.

Consider the audience's attention span - make it interesting, for example, don't just present lots of complicated statistics.

Use rhetoric to persuade - consider using the three pillars of rhetoric:

Ethos - the ethical appeal

Pathos - the emotional appeal

Logos - the logical appeal

Use notes but keep them brief and well organized. Use a different piece of paper for rebuttals.

Similar to looking at conclusions to create rebuttals, think comparatively by asking yourself "How does my plan compare to what's happening now/what would happen in the world if the other team won?" You can win the debate if you can make comparative claims about why your arguments matter more than the other team.

Only tell jokes if you're naturally good at it otherwise this can backfire.

Flexibility is important because you might get allocated the side of the argument you don't agree with. You'll have to work hard to overcome your views. Also use this insight to think of the potential arguments you might make and then plan for counter arguments.

Voice

Speak clearly and concisely.

You must talk fast enough to have the time to deliver your speech but slow enough so you can be understood.

Project your voice to the back of the room.

Incorporate pauses.

Emphasize important words and vary your tone appropriately.

Confidence

Have a relaxed pose and posture.

Avoid filler words.

Know your material.

Emphasize using gestures.

Maintain eye contact with the audience.

Language

Keep your language simple to avoid confusion.

Refer to the opposite side as: "My opponent".

When making a rebuttal say: "My opponent said..., however..."

Don't exaggerate - avoid the words "never" or "always" etc.

Avoid saying that a speaker "is wrong", instead say that "your idea is mistaken".

What to avoid

Falsifying, making up or altering evidence.

Attacking a speaker rather than an idea.

Acting aggressively or offensively towards debaters, judges, audience etc.

Interrupting other debaters as this can suggest that your argument isn't very strong.

Disagreeing with facts or obvious truths.

There are common flaws you can look for to form a rebuttal:

1. False dichotomy

2. Assertion

3. Morally flawed

4. Correlation rather than causation

5. Failure to deliver promises

6. Straw man

7. Contradiction

8. Compare the conclusion to reality

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How can a valid will be amended ?
AlekseyPX

Answer:

Explanation: One way to make changes to a last will is to make a codicil, which is an amendment to a last will. You should not make any changes on your will after it has been signed. If you cross out a person's name or add a clause, your change will not be valid and your entire will might become invalid.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Is the Iraq War Resolution consistent with the War Powers Act?
pantera1 [17]

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How many jurors are in a flordida trial court​
    5·2 answers
  • What is the penalty of shoplifting in Florida?
    12·2 answers
  • PharMax, a pharmaceutical manufacturer, sells its drugs for use in not-for-profit hospitals at a lower wholesale price than the
    14·1 answer
  • What are the legislatives (Congress’s) expanded powers?
    15·1 answer
  • Policy implementation refers to the bureaucratic function of
    13·1 answer
  • What the Executive Order must state:
    9·1 answer
  • How do the religion clauses of the First Amendment protect individual rights?
    12·2 answers
  • The main focus of the Innocence Project is
    9·1 answer
  • Are two cases every really identical? Let's take a look at the cases below.
    8·1 answer
  • 2
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!