Answer: I would think yes.
Explanation:
Answer:
D.) Rather than Owens’ lacing the Arabica coffee beans with Robusta beans, the producers that supplied Owens with coffee beans had mixed
their Arabica beans with Robusta beans, and marketed them to Owen as pure Arabica. However, the court found that Owens could have
discovered that this was occurring by using reasonable care.
and
B.) Starbucks had been informed by Owens that Owens had laced its marketed Arabica coffee beans with Robusta beans
Explanation:
First wee need to understand what is reasonable care. "Is the degree of caution and concern for the safety of the self and others and ordinarily prudent and rational person would use in the same circumstances".
Unlike Neglicence where is a failure to act reasonable and carefully.
In this case Owens didn´t know, however they failed to provide resonable cause. But he act with concern telling starbucks what happened, but still he is held for damages.
Answer:
if i am not wrong there are 9 supreme court justices.
