Answer:
c. Spencer will win because regardless of whether Glen was acting within the scope of his employment, Sally is liable for his negligence.
Explanation:
Spencer will win because regardless of whether Glen was acting within the scope of his employment, Sally is liable for his negligence. Sally is obligated for his carelessness. Since Sally employed Glen and the obligation of any carelessness turns into Sally's inevitably.
Answer:d
Explanation:
Homeland security and to control public violence
The answer for this may vary depending on the state you live in. For my state, it would be a fine for their first DUI conviction. I recommend looking it up and reviewing your state’s punishment/law.
My answer:
A. A fine of up to $4000
Answer:
Rodney should win the case because he showed up to do the work but Yolanda failed to perform her part of the contract (provide the paint).
The legal term used to describe Rodney's offer of performance is tender or attempted performance. In this case, Rodney (the promisor) went to Yolanda's house and offered to perform his painting services. Yolanda (the promisee) did not perform her part of the contract by not providing the paint, so the promisor was unable to perform. Since Rodney's non-performance was directly caused by Yolanda's non-performance, he is not liable for anything since Yolanda lost her rights because she breached the contract first.
