Middle was poor and had more farmers and workers
Answer :
The Mexican-American War
Explanation :
The Mexican-American War allowed for the United States to gain and conquer the Southwest. This war also caused sectional conflict in the years leading up to the Civil War.
The setting in “”Words On Fire” that relate to the plot/theme is that it explains the peaceful living of 12-year-old Audra on the farm of her parent.
<h3>What is the setting in Words on Fire?</h3>
The settings explains the story of 12-year-old Audra, and the quit and peaceful living in the farm of her parent in Lithuania .
The theme which is the main idea or underlying meaning that is been explore in short story serves as the main idea that the text is surrounding.
It should be noted that Setting which can be regarded as the time as well as the place that is been used in writing a story is a literary element of literature and can be seen in the "Words On Fire" in how Audra was able to have a peaceful living in Lithuania with her parents as at that time
Therefore, settings in this story, which was introduced during the exposition of the story, to let the audience know about places of the characters.
Learn more about theme at:
brainly.com/question/11600913
#SPJ1
A centrally planned economy opposes individual choice in comparison to a market economy.
In a centrally planned economy, a government entity decides how resources within a society will be distributed. For example, in a perfect centrally planned society, all families with 4 members in the household would receive the exact same products.
However, in a market economy, individuals make decisions for themselves regarding what resources they want/need to purchase. This market economy is based more on the capital (money) that individuals possess.
The McCulloch v. Maryland is the case that went to the Supreme Court because the state of Maryland wanted to tax the National Bank established by the Congress. The court ruled that under the Article I, Section 8, the "Necessary and Proper" clause that the state could not tax the institution of the the federal government. This is an landmark case and its effect was that this supported the federal government over the state governments.
