1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dimas [21]
3 years ago
8

Which tools were used by primitive people for hunting?​

History
2 answers:
LenKa [72]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

hand axes and choppers for cutting up meat and scrapers for cleaning animal hides. Other tools were used to dig roots, peel bark and remove the skins of animals. Later, splinters of bones were used as needles and fishhooks.

Explanation:

Lera25 [3.4K]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The most common are daggers and spear points for hunting, hand axes and choppers for cutting up meat and scrapers for cleaning animal hides. Other tools were used to dig roots, peel bark and remove the skins of animals. Later, splinters of bones were used as needles and fishhooks.

You might be interested in
Which three locations completed the Triangular Trade?
swat32

That would be Europe, the Indies and North America. So the answer A

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
how would you define the term "massacre"? How many people have to die in order for an event to be called a "massacre".
SpyIntel [72]

Answer:

Explanation:

Massacre: an indiscriminate and brutal slaughter of people.

“an indiscriminate and brutal slaughter of many people” Many is of course “A large quantity”. So there we have it, certainly more than a couple but if it gets to be say 100,000, which is definitely a large number, I suspect that might be encroaching into the realms of genocide.

OK so if you happen upon a car crash and there are bodies spread over the scene, 2 from each of the 2 cars, then you would immediately spot, just by looking there were 4 people involved, but if it was a pair of coaches each with 52 passengers and they were all spread around the scene you wouldn’t be able to put a number to it by just sweeping your eyes across the mess, perhaps then it is getting to be a massacre. Could that be a useful definition? If the number slaughtered is more than you can estimate merely with a look? I also think it needs to be within a definable area, like a football field, or a stadium or perhaps a town. If it involved a whole region of a country then it becomes Genocide, maybe.

Could it be then The indiscriminate and brutal slaughter of more people within a definable area than you can estimate readily with a sweep of your eyes.

Just a suggestion, so go gently on me ………….

6 0
3 years ago
Which factor most contributed to the development of mills in the North?
Rudik [331]
I think it is B because they had fertile farmland
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The temperance movement achieved its goals with the passage of:
Ede4ka [16]
It’s D. The 18th amendment
8 0
3 years ago
Indian Territory consisted of the following areas
navik [9.2K]

C

Explanation:

indian territory consisted on Oklahoma and Nebraska

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Who was the most influential philosopher in Chinese history
    7·2 answers
  • 2. Describe the Homestead Act.
    14·2 answers
  • If the U.S. constitution began as suggested by the cartoon what might the impact be on the Supreme Court?
    14·2 answers
  • What is the isrealates escape from Egypt called
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following is accurate about the aftermath of the war?
    9·1 answer
  • What term is used when stronger nations acquire weaker nations?
    13·1 answer
  • Does Pearson’s methodology as it is described in these and previous chapters align with the methodology suggested by “Archeology
    7·1 answer
  • Who did not recognize the Dutch colony?
    15·1 answer
  • What did the case of Worcester vs. Georgia determine?
    15·1 answer
  • The events on the timeline above were all steps taken to-
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!