The decision in Marbury v. Madison said that the judicial department must <u>a. enforce</u> the law.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Marbury v. Madison was a critical case handled by Supreme Court of America. This case helps in bringing some special powers to judicial department in the United States of America.
According to this review, the courts in America gained the power to knock down the laws, order, and even some actions taken by government which causes violation of the Constitution of the United States of America.
The judicial department of America have acquired to power to change the law and order of the constitution. The decision in Marbury v. Madison was taken by chief justice: <u>John Marshall.
</u>
Answer:
Imm soo sorry ii dont know
Explanation:i dont know soory
True The disinhibition effect means that people tend to open up earlier with more distressing issues over the Internet than they do face-to-face. Group of answer choices
<h3>What is
disinhibition effect?</h3>
The online disinhibition effect is the lack of restraint one feels when communicating online versus in person. People feel more comfortable saying things online that they would not say in person because they can remain completely anonymous and invisible behind a computer screen.
There are two kinds of disinhibition: benign disinhibition and toxic disinhibition. Suler (2004) explained that while one element may be enough to cause a person to exhibit either a benign or toxic effect, in reality, people are exposed to a variety of elements at the same time, resulting in a more complex effect.
To know more about disinhibition effect follow the link:
brainly.com/question/14158775
#SPJ4
Those with the power in democracy are arguable the individuals who are elected in a representative democracy or those that are in the majority in a strict definition of democracy. They keep their power by remaining in the majority position on issues that are important to them or continuing to be elected. And the role of the individual in a strict democracy is not very important because it is the collective that has greater strength than the individual but an individual can still vote to influence democracy.
