In this article, Li and Gleitman are questioning the implications of the Whorf–Sapir linguistic relativity hypothesis.
The hypothesis argues (based on linguistic studies of Mayan populations) that the language of a society determines the members’ spatial reasoning, or the way they think about locations and distances. The Mayans use a spatial-coordinate system (ex. “to the north”) as opposed to a viewer-perspective system (ex. “to the left”).
Li and Gleitman question the findings, and they devise a research that involves only English speakers, but where they manipulate landmark cues. While they do not claim to have proven the Whorf–Sapir linguistic relativity hypothesis wrong, they argue that the availability of landmark cues plays a larger role in spatial reasoning than the linguistic system itself.
Answer:
Imaginary world
Explanation:
The imaginary world is constructed in our minds and we seem to see it around us
Answer:
They are measured in degrees, please give brainliest
Explanation:
Option A describes that the grid-lines of the map are measure in degrees, which are very true as the grid are lined with angular measurement which thus be done in unit of angles and is in degrees only
<span> they are interchangeable terms. </span>
<span>Money and Currency are the same thing. Nothing more than a tool which facilities trade.
</span>Which statement shows that money is a "store of value?
<span>a.I exchanged my dollar for ten dimes.
</span>Anything called money will be <span> backed by gold</span>
