Answer:
The answer is dispositional and situational, respectively.
Explanation:
A dispositional attribution judgement holds a person's internal traits as responsible for an outcome. In the example, you think the skier fell due to his lack of skills.
On the other hand, a situational attribution holds the conditions of the environment or the situation as responsible for the outcome.
Studies show that <u>situational attribution is more common when judging our own outcomes</u>, especially when negative.
Ahahhahahahahahhahahaha CCcC
Presidential meetings usually are about classified information, which means that they can be top secret, secret and confidential. Usually, in these presidential meetings matters of national security and defense against terrorism are discussed and if information of these meetings is released to the public national security might be at risk.
Despite this, The Presidential Records Act - created in 1981 - determines the preservation of all presidential records. The Act determines that public access to Presidential records can begin five years after the end of the Administration.
Answer: Speaker 1
In this example, speaker 2 does not feel represented by any of the major parties of the United States. Speaker 3, on the other hand, does identify with a party platform, but has no real representation because the party has no elected officials. Speaker 4 does not feel represented by any party, or by the political system of the country. Speaker 1, however, does identify with a party that has elected officials in power. He has hope of gaining even more power, but he is also the most likely person to feel represented by the current political situation.
Mate, your answer would be <span>eclectic therapy.
</span>
