I would go with realism bc the definition of it is: the attitude or practice of accepting a situation as it is and being prepared to deal with it accordingly.
I hope this helps you :) also, if you could choose two answers I would go with intellectualism too
The highlighted land is perfect for growing crops due to the ambulance of water
Explanation:
The fertile Crescent was mostly located in the area between the between and around the Tigris in through the Euphrates rivers and was extremely fertile due to sediment and soil deposited from the rivers
Or I just had this question lol
Hey!
Hope this helps...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I do not believe there is the right reason for any country to go into war. Although if I had to pick one reason that a country might go into a war, or a reason that could be justifiable for going into war. My decision would be going into war to protect an ally from an invasion.
This is not because of the thought of war, this is because if a country lose his allies, it would be defenseless when war is thrust of the pawn that country who needed that Ally.
So i would say the answer is: B.) to protect an Ally from an invasion.
<span>The subject of the dependent clause belongs in the nominative case. The nominative case is one of the grammatical cases of a noun or other part of speech, which generally points the subject of the predicate noun or a verb or predicate adjective, against its object or other verb arguments.</span>