The answer is: D. Increasing the capacity of the bottleneck increases capacity for the whole system
Companies who use bottleneck management would stock large number of their products in their disposal before eventually release them to the consumers on a large scale.
Increasing the capacity of the bottle neck does not necessarily increase the capacity of the whole system because there are limits on how much the employees (specifically the sales department) could sell. There is always a huger risk of overstock that could resulted in a huge loss for the company.
Answer:
b) Reactive
Explanation:
A reactive approach is when managers respond to situations and problems as they occur rather than plan for them before hand as this is an added cost.
Proactive managers seek out opportunities to always input CSR in their strategies. Accommodative strategies and defensive strategies build in some leeway. None of these options completely discount csr as a cost as does the reactive style.
Hope that helps.
The correct answer is D) All of these scenarios demonstrate decreasing marginal utility.
The scenario that demonstrates decreasing marginal utility is the three mentioned above.
The principle of diminishing marginal utility states that the additional utility a consumer receives from an additional unit of a good or service decreases as consumption of it increases. So that is the case of example number one when you are grateful that you have your air conditioning while you are outside on the streets under the sunshine, but when you get back home, after cooling down, you feel like normal, and do not appreciate that so much or maybe you start questioning if the air conditioning bill and power bill are too much.
The same in the case of Beth and the second or third pillow, she doesn't enjoy them too much and thinks that the third one was unnecessary. Or James at the buffet. It is all you can eat but his dish is half empty.
Answer:
XYZ is not a good investment as compared to Bank because it has lower per year interest than the bank.
Explanation:
Bank offers 8% per year
To compare the investment we should calculate the holding period return of the share which is as follows
Holding period return = ( Dividend + Change in price ) / Initial price )
Holding period return = ( $5 +($120 - 110) ) / $110 ) = ( $5 + $10 ) / $110 = 0.1364 = 13.64%
Return per year = 13.64% / 3 = 4.5% per year
150,000e^(0.055)(15)
342,282.114799
Subtract the two monthly payments
342,282.11-2,451.26
339830.85
