1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Elodia [21]
3 years ago
10

What is the constitutional division

History
1 answer:
timama [110]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

its D

Explanation:

Its D because the National Government can have the most division powers and the 3 branches cant because they are a different rank in the governement

Hope this helped please give a brainliest and a thanks

You might be interested in
Why did plato and aristotle have strong beliefs against democracy?
Alborosie

Answer:

The correct answer is rule of law.

Explanation:

Plato and Aristotle had strong beliefs against the rule of law.

The rule of law is the legal concept that says that no one is exempt from the law, including monarchs or people in power. Plato and Aristotle also referred to tyranny, the form of government that exists when people allow one individual to ha all the power. In this scenario, the ruler uses its power for the benefit of its own interests. Both philosophers heavily favored democracy. The lived in Athens, the city-state where democracy was created.

3 0
3 years ago
How did Jim Crow Laws impact politics? including Plessy v Ferguson
lina2011 [118]

Answer:

Plessy v. Ferguson was a landmark 1896 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation under the “separate but equal” doctrine. ... As a result, restrictive Jim Crow legislation and separate public accommodations based on race became commonplace.Oct 29,

6 0
3 years ago
Why did england pass the intolerable acts?
dimulka [17.4K]
The English passed the Intolerable Acts to punish the colonists for the Boston Tea Party. Hope that helps!
5 0
3 years ago
Does Zinn offer a convincing argument
VLD [36.1K]

Howard Zinn Howard Zinn’s argument on the nature of the American War for Independence was the war for independence was not a social revolution. Instead, he argues the colonial elite used the war for their own personal gain in power and status. The wealthy.

5 0
2 years ago
Explain the philosophy and nations of two progressive presidents
Afina-wow [57]

Answer:

Theodore Roosevelt

Woodrow Wilson

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • One example of the cultural advancements made during the gutpa empire is the
    11·1 answer
  • George Mason refised to sign the Consitution and oppsed its Ratification becaused he blieved that it
    14·1 answer
  • Which type of media outlet uses a rating system to attract advertisers!
    14·2 answers
  • Which ethnic population was brutally killed because of the nationalism and prejudice of the Young Turks?
    10·2 answers
  • During any type of mineral growth, atoms accumulate on
    9·1 answer
  • Why did the national government slowly go broke?
    7·1 answer
  • What document is the source of this quote?
    10·1 answer
  • __________ was elected president of the Republic of Texas in 1836.
    5·2 answers
  • What were three economic benefits of Hawaii's annexation? I know that it provided sugar and a stopping point for merchants but I
    9·1 answer
  • The reform efforts of Dorothea Dix during the mid-nineteenth century led to – Question 3 options: improved education for immigra
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!