When it came to the early 1500's, there was no separation of church and state. The king was always kept in check by the church. Although everybody in the kingdoms answered to the kings, the kings answered to God. All the rules that were put in place were done so in respect of the church's commandments, keeping in mind what God wanted the people to do.
Yes for sure !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
What the author is claiming based on what is said here is that there are issues with the way that the president of the country is elected.
<h3>What is the way that the president of the United States is elected?</h3>
The office of the number one person in the United states is elected through the use of the electoral college in the nation. The electoral college is made up of a number of citizens that have the final say on who gets to be the president.
The author as well as many others have seen this system as an outdated and rather ineffective system to the ways that the president is chosen.
They prefer the situation where the number 1 is picked totally by the citizens.
Read more on United States presidential election here: brainly.com/question/1328636
#SPJ1
Answer:
<em>1</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>Freedom </em><em>leads </em><em>to </em><em>innovation</em>
<em>2</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>Culture</em><em> </em><em>determines </em><em>a </em><em>society's</em><em> </em><em>future</em><em> </em>
<em>3</em><em>. </em><em>Technology</em><em> </em><em>can </em><em>be </em><em>used </em><em>for </em><em>good </em><em>and </em><em>bad </em>
<em>4</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>Education</em><em> </em><em>is </em><em>the </em><em>to </em><em>bright </em><em>future</em><em> </em>
Answer:
It is very doubtful the same solution could have worked.
Explanation:
The United States was born as a federation of the 13 former British colonies, which, after years of debate, finally settled for a federal pact, creating a central government and states that had considerable power over their territories, as a means of balancing the power between states and the federal government. But in the end, regional identities aside, all states saw themselves as American states and the federal government as an American institution. However, in Great Britain, history had been different. The US has states, but the United Kingdom has nations. Many people from these nations of the British Islands, especially from Scotland and Ireland, saw the English as invaders, and the British government as an institution that represented the will and the interests of the English. A common British identity never fully developed in the same sense as the American one, and the same solution probably couldn't have worked in both countries. Eventually some powers were devolved to national legislatures in the United Kingdom, but legally, they're still subordinated to the British central government.
