The main reason that would make a country to end its participation in a war because it has become immoral is the presence of war crimes.
<h3>What are War Crimes?</h3>
This refers to the inhumane actions that a person or soldier, usually fighting in a foreign country metes out on people, such as unprovoked aggression, extra-judicial killings, genocide, etc
Hence, we can see that the presence of war crimes is the main reason why a country would pull out of a war and claims it is immoral as this would have infringed on human rights.
Read more about war crimes here:
brainly.com/question/1550237
#SPJ1
Answer: Freedom of speech
Explanation:
The First Amendment in the Constitution of the United States helps in the protection of the freedom of religion, the freedom of speech, religion and also that of the press.
The First Amendment that's violated in the above case is the freedom of speech. People have the right to freedom of speech and no one should arrest others based on their speech or take such rights away from them.
ANSWER: <u>The Dred Scott v. Sandford Case</u>, decided on March 6, 1857.
Answer:
Communism on paper is good but in practice.. meh not really.
Explanation:
The Soviet Union, Vietnam, China, and Cuba advocate Capitalist policies because they can make more money off of that. True Communism, such as Marxism would be unrealistically hard to pull off in actual society. This means no one should move up the social ladder as that would go against the ideals of Communism. People are naturally ambitious, which would be a problem with the economics of true Communism.
The Committees of Correspondence were formed to increase communication between the different colonies. They were shadow governments formed by Patriots and extremely influential leading up to the American Revolution, as they boycotted English products and made plans for collective action. The committees would communicate and consolidate small way to be independent of England.
