I would probably urge him to engage in guerrilla warfare to be more successful in his military campaigns against the American troops and to fortify his new town Prophetstown to be better prepared against attack by American forces .
One of the most important lessons that the Starbuck's leadership lab provides to its store managers is developing the a sense of corporate pride and responsibility, along with the element of understanding the importance of a positive customer interface and assisting the manager's in developing that positive atmosphere in the context of their stores.
Answer:
$1 or 100% of the tax
Explanation:
When the price elasticity of demand is 0, it means that the good or service will be purchased regardless of its cost. Very few things have such a low price elasticity, and the fact that this is drug for treating cancer is the reason why that happens. Anyone that can purchase a drug that will keep you alive, will do so as long as you have enough money to do so. Another good with a very low price elasticity, but not 0, is gasoline with a 0.02 to 0.04, and gasoline is a basic necessity also.
The curve for a perfectly inelastic good is vertical. So any increase in taxes will be paid by the customers.
Answer and Explanation:
a. The computation of the internal rate of return is shown below:
Given that
The expected cash inlfows would be $9,400 for four years each
Rate of return is 7%
The Initial investment is $30,455
Based on the above information
The net present value is
= $9,400 × PVIFA factor for 7% at 4 years - $30,455
= $9,400 × 3.3872 - $30,455
= $31,840 - $30,455
= $1,385
Now the present value factor is
= $30,455 ÷ $9,400
= 3.2399
Now based on the factor table, the rate should be 9% for four years
b. Yes depend upon the internal rate of return, the park co should make the investment
Answer:
C. strictly liable for Will's injuries
Explanation:
In law, Strict liability is a situation when defendant is required to be responsible to a certain situation, but can't be considered as guilty to any violation.
There are two points that need to be highlighted from the case above:
1. Astor Manufacturing process has fulfilled all of its safety regulation for storing the dangerous product.
2. The dangerous product owned by Astor Manufacturing caused William's injury.
The regulations for hazard management is created by the government, and the leak is not caused by their negligence. It's caused by unexpected natural disaster. This is why we can't say that Astor is guilty to any violation.
But still, the chemical that they created injured William. The court will most likely force Astor to be responsible for all the medical expenses incurred by william.
