Answer:
Voluntary consent:
In the current case there exists an absence of the voluntary consent with respect to Mr Jerome because of over the top impact and coercion. Mr Jerome relies totally upon Mr Philip because of which the last could impact him. Mr Jerome can show that he didn't genuinely consent to the agreement so he can either hold fast to the agreement or pull back. Mr Philip had a great deal of impact over the old Mr Jerome and consequently could beat his free will. Under the current conditions the agreement was gone into under an excessive amount of impact and is voidable.
Answer:
Revenue / Sales
Explanation:
Operating cash flow is net of the cash received from the revenue and paid for the expenses during the year. Increase in revenue will lead to an increase in operating cash flow of a profitable business. Operating cash flow is net of the cash received from the revenue and paid for the expenses during the year. on the other hand the increase in Expenses will result in the decrease in operating cash flows.
Answer:
A.Economic integration
Explanation:
Economic Integration is a trade agreement that exists among countries within the same geographic location which includes reduced or removing tariffs and other trade barriers so that there will be free flow of certain goods and services coupled with other factors of production within the region. This is important because it helps to reduce the cost involved in trade and making goods and services available within member state. This agreement is also known as regional integration because it exist between nations in the same region. For example economic integration between West African States.
Answer:
The company must not make any adjustment entries in year x3 since the FOB means "Free on board" and at the moment the buyer delivers the goods at the port of shipment, at that time the risks of loss or damage of merchandise are transferred to the buyer from the seller
When this happens, the sale is made since the seller no longer owns the merchandise.
n this case, the seller does not own the merchandise since December 28 and has already made the corresponding records. so he should not make any adjustments.
Might seem controversial though :) but I am pretty sure that the correct variant that properly shows the converse of given statement is the third one. As you know, the converse (in plane language) has the same meaning of the statement just by replacing two points. This statement has positive tone (if you make - you ll have) so it's directly coincides with C(you have, cause you have made)
