Answer:
When the Supreme Court rules on a constitutional issue, that judgment is virtually final; its decisions can be altered only by the rarely used procedure of constitutional amendment or by a new ruling of the Court. However, when the Court interprets a statute, new legislative action can be taken.
Answer:
This requirement only applies when the law in question requires the government to have acted.
This state action requirement extends to a number of actions.
According to the Supreme Court in Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co., Inc., 500 U.S. 614 (1991), "Although the conduct of private parties lies beyond the Constitution's scope in most instances, governmental authority may dominate an activity to such an extent that its participants must be deemed to act with the authority of the government and, as a result, be subject to constitutional constraints."
Explanation:
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
The U.S. entered into the Vietnam War in their fight to stop the spread of communism. China had close ties with communist North Vietnam and were afraid that communism would spread to the South, so the U.S. entered and provided support to the South Vietnamese.
Many Americans did not support the war on moral grounds, but the primarily reason was because people felt the war was an entanglement in a foreign civil war. Furthermore, they felt the war had no clear objective or endgame and that it was a waste of money, resources, and American lives. The war lasted twenty years, and resulted in America pulling out with nothing to show for it.
All were popular ideas or inventions in England and came to the colonies with the Puritans.
