They were usually paid the ransack enemy ships rather than focusing on anyone else, they delivered information to people under the radar as well.
Answer:
Explanation:
An institution drawing membership from at least three sovereign states. Members are held together by formal agreements. There are intergovernmental organizations and nongovernmental organizations. They range in different purposes but have the same goal of cooperating internationally to work to solve or regulate problems. An example of an intergovernmental organization is the United Nations. Includes IGOs, INGOs and Supranationalism.
Answer:
copper and iron swords were easier to make but less durable while bronze and steel swords were more effective for combat but more difficult to fashion.
Explanation:
Pros
- Copper: It was a very common material and it could be sharpened easily.
- Iron: Like copper, very easy to find and harder than copper, so it is a better option to fabricate iron swords than copper swords.
- Bronze: Bronze is harder than copper and its rust is just shallow which make bronze swords way durable in comparison. With the materials in hand (copper and tin), it was easy to fabricate bronze swords on a great scale.
- Steel: This is the most durable and hardest of all the elements above.
Cons
- Copper: Easy to get rusty and be broken.
- Iron: Sucseptible to severe oxidation, although it is more durable than copper.
- Bronze: As this is an alloy, it requires copper and tin, which it is not very common to find close each other, so it makes difficult to make bronze swords. Additionally, bronze weapons do not last very much; they are easy to break.
- Steel: Unlike bronze, steel rusting can wreck the sword if it is treated in time. Additionally, on ancient times, steel forges were very uncommon as not many knew the way to create steel from iron and carbon, so steel swords were very expensive and more likely to find in hand of kings and royal guards.
Answer: False.
Explanation:
Woodrow Wilson once promised, "The United States will never again seek one additional foot of territory by conquest."
Part 1.
First, we must define what the feudal system was. It was sort of obligation between the peasants and who worked the land and the lords who possessed the land. Feudal lords were very wealthy powerful in the Middle Ages. Then, slowly towns began to break away and grew independent of the local Feudal lord. Guilds or unions settled in those towns and began to produce high-quality goods that made them very wealthy. Eventually, these guilds turned into what we know now as middle class. The labor force was then on demand and peasants moved to these towns and stopped trading their labor for food and protection with the lords. These weakened the power and influence of aristocracy and gave room to the rise of a wealthy middle class. Some of the towns which played a major role in the new economic system were Pisa, Venice, and Florence.
Part 2
We understand monopoly as the total control of the commercial market. Being that said, we can surely say that guilds were monopolies for the following reasons:
1) Guilds set restrictions to outsiders. Simply because outsiders were taken as a threat in terms of competition.
2) Guilds had little or none regulations. They used this advantage to advance their own interest.
