Answer:
a. Smaller class size is related to better academic performance.
Explanation:
A hypothesis is a testable prediction, a scientific guess of what you expect to happen from a study. There are directional and non directional hypothesis, the directional hypothesis states exactly what you expect such as " smaller class size is related to better academic performance while a non directional hypothesis predicts that there will be an effect but does not specify the direction, example is "smaller class size is related to academic performance".
The option chosen is an example of a directional hypothesis, option b, c, and d are more statements of facts and not hypothesis.
Answer:
1. Foreseeable Misuse
2. Is
3. Would
4. Would
5. Would
Explanation:
1. Under the Foreseeable Misuse factor, a manufacturer could still be held liable for a mishap caused by the consumer not using the product as intended because it is believed that the Manufacturer should have anticipated that Misuse as well as it's damage.
2. "Is" is the correct word to complete the sentence.
3. "Would" is the correct word to complete the sentence.
4. "Would" is the correct word to complete the sentence.
5. "Would" is the correct word to complete the sentence.
Answer:
Waxing
HOPE THIS HELPS
- Todo ❤️
Explanation:
Where as losing pieces would be waning
Answer:
The answer that best fits into this sentence would be "denied the opportunity to obtain"
Explanation:
This is because Melvin Tumin was a firm believer on social stratification. This is a system that classifies people into different groups that depend on their wealth, income, social status and derived power. This makes it extremely difficult for underprivileged kids to achieve their dreams of becoming successful in a certain profession because in order to get to that level they need certain resources and contacts that are only available to higher class groups.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
The 26th Amendment allows those who turn 18 years old, the legal right to vote. So, if we did not have the 26th Amendment, technically speaking, anyone would be allowed to vote at any age. This could render elections unfair, as families with more children than others would have more voting power.