1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jolli1 [7]
3 years ago
5

Why should there be laws against the use of cell phones while driving?

Law
2 answers:
Misha Larkins [42]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

to protect us

Explanation:

laila [671]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Because of the amount of deaths, and car accidents cause by the use of cell phones while driving.

Explanation:

Cellphones are a heavy distraction by itself, it keeps you from doing things like school work, chores, or having a social life. Cellphones in the car means a more heavy distraction because you're doing two things at once and if you are not focusing on the road there is a higher chance of you crashing your car and hurting yourself or someone else.

Hope this helps.

You might be interested in
What argument can be made that would have kept president bush from becoming the running mate of john mccain in 2008?
hammer [34]

Answer:

The dummies would argue two term limit but he would have been vice President not president

6 0
3 years ago
Arbitration and litigation are considered much more consensual actions on the ADR.
Zanzabum

Answer: True

Explanation:

Except for the two ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) methods above mediation also come in handy so one need to study the best method that suits the client.

6 0
3 years ago
Will mark brainliest!!
Finger [1]

Answer:

I belive its B.

because it doesn't mention that in the Bill of rights...I believe:/

3 0
3 years ago
Hsu was indicted for violating the Economic Espio- nage Act by conspiring to steal corporate trade secrets for an anti-cancer dr
loris [4]

Answer:

Hsu was indicted for violating the Economic Espio- nage Act by conspiring to steal corporate trade secrets for an anti-cancer drug. The defense requested a copy of the trade secret documents. The government contended that the defense did not need access to the documents except under supervision of the judge. The defense maintained a right of full access to the documents so the defense of impossibil- ity could be established, meaning Hsu could not steal trade secrets that did not exist. District court agreed with the defense; government appealed. Must the defendant be allowed full access to trade secrets that are a key part of a case? [U.S. v. Hsu, 155 F. 3d 189, 3rd Cir. (1998)]

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
How does the Constitution outline the different powers of the Judicial Branch?
Colt1911 [192]
Article III of the Constitution establishes the judicial branch of Government with the creation of the Supreme Court. Section 1 of Article III begins: The judicial Power of the United States shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How many delegates were at the constitutional convention?
    13·1 answer
  • Janet, a twenty year old women, applied for a position driving a truck for Federal Trucking Inc. Janet, who is 5'4" tall and wei
    12·1 answer
  • It's a good idea to take a nap or call a rideshare service _____.
    6·1 answer
  • Select the statement that indicates retaliatory proctectionism
    15·1 answer
  • Who owns the rights to sell Cadbury in the US? Why is this a conflict now?
    10·2 answers
  • A small cruise ship struck a whale swimming underwater, causing the ship to suddenly lurch sideways. A passenger on the ship who
    10·1 answer
  • Question 7
    15·2 answers
  • You are an off-duty officer who has just completed a three-mile run. You decide to cool off and rest under a big oak tree. You s
    6·1 answer
  • Question 33 (4 points)
    5·2 answers
  • Why should people not vote?
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!