The Roman Empire was located in the Mediterranean, making the capital, Rome, a launch pad of sorts for all its expansionist ventures. Basically, Rome became wealthy by conquering its neighbors, taking back wealth to the capital where it was used accordingly to improve infrastructure, like roads, bridges, aquaducts and sewage systems. This infrastructure made travel easier around the empire, supporting the growth of trade and making conquest even easier. The booty that came back from sacking foreign lands also payed the soldiers' salary, and so the military became a means of earning wealth and status as one climbed the ranks. To continue to pay these soldiers, and to satisfy their ambitions for wealth and prestige that so came from war, Rome had to continue expanding, a lot. This contributed even more wealth to the empire (though later causing its collapse as over-expansion presented costly army maintenance fees and increased the length of the borders that needed to be defended, within and without). Beyond that, Rome's domination over the Mediterranean was good for trade and technological advances allowed for ships that could cross the Mediterranean sea, further stimulating trade. Controlling these trade routes also contributed to increased wealth that could be used for both internal growth and external expansion.
Another view of the industrialist is that of "captain of industry." The term captain views these men as viewed ingenious and industrious leaders who transformed the American economy with their business skills. They were praised for their skills as well as for their philanthropy (charity).
In reality the debate over robber barons and captains of industry mirrors views of industrialism itself. Just as their were both positives and negatives to industrialism there were positives and negatives to the leaders of industrialism.
La respuesta correcta a esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
Desafortunadamente no se anexa el nombre del texto al que se refiere la pregunta o algún otro tipo de referencia que nos ayude a identificar exactamente a qué tipo de texto se refiere, ya que sobre el tema de Auschwitz, hay cientos de textos, artículos y reportajes.
Sin embargo, podemos comentar lo siguiente.
Hay un texto académico que se refiere a el terrible campo de concentración y las horribles vejaciones que sufrieron los judíos en ese campo de concentración Nazi. El texto surge debido a los 75 años de la liberación de los presos en ese campo de concentración.
El cuestionamiento central que se hace en ese texto es que el odio hacia los judíos debe ser resuelto desde la raíz, desde el mismo origen que provoca ese sentimiento.
Se trata de un texto que busca mantener la objetividad en su escritura para recordar las terribles escenas de ese campo de concentración durante la Segunda Guerra Mundial. El texto menciona una reunión en Israel, a la que existieron líderes de toas partes para plantearse este cuestionamiento y buscar respuestas.
Hxjdjdjdjdkdkhhjhhhhhhhhh
