Ask question

Ask question

All categories

Y_Kistochka [10]

3 years ago

14

If you receive 10 units of utility from consuming one cup of coffee and 16 units of utility from consuming two cups of coffee, w

hich of the following is the likely amount of utility you will receive from consuming three cups of coffee?

1 answer:

Sauron [17]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

26

Explanation:

You might be interested in

A rule that all employees in the organization (including the ceo) must fly coach when they travel on commercial airlines represe

Eva8 [605]

The word that completes the sentence is bureaucratic. bureaucratic control is one of the control systems that are defined as systems of rules that are devised and implemented that are applicable to global business and maybe unique to a specific business. it is an important tool for risk management as well.

5 0

2 years ago

________ company emphasizes its home country culture throughout its operations, and it tends to staff key positions abroad with

photoshop1234 [79]

Answer:

The correct answer is letter "C": An ethnocentric.

Explanation:

An ethnocentric company is the type of organization that promotes the culture of its own culture among employees and focuses on providing local workers with the best opportunities possible so they can be competitive. These firms have a nationalistic approach and have the main goal of contributing to their country's development.

7 0

3 years ago

Dragon Inc. a NJ based construction firm is evaluating whether to replace an aging machine with a new model. For the old machine

Vilka [71]

Answer:

It should replace the old machine. In the current accounting period.

Explanation:

We need to perform a relevant cost analysis:

Keep the machine:

F0 = $0

F1 = $1500 maintenance

F2 = $3,000 maintenance

F3 = $6,000 maintenance

F4 = $12,000 maintenance

F5 =$24,000 maintenance + 250 resale value

replace the machine:

F0 = -12,000 purchase + 4,000 sale of old machine = -800

F1 = $900 maintenance

F2 = $900 maintenance

F3 = $900 maintenance

F4 = $900 maintenance

F5 =$900 maintenance + 1,500 resale value

As revenues are the same for each machine, we ignore them. We will only focus on the cost each machine generate:

We solve for the present worth of each machine with a discount rate of 12%

$\displaystyle PV_{old} = -\frac{1,500}{1.12} - \frac{3,000}{1.12^2} - \frac{6,000}{1.12^3} - \frac{12,000}{1.12^4} - \frac{23,750}{1.12^5}\\\\\displaystyle PV_{old} = -29,104.15$

$\displaystyle PV_{new} = -8,000 - \frac{900}{1.12} - \frac{900}{1.12^2} - \frac{900}{1.12^3} - \frac{900}{1.12^4} + \frac{600}{1.12^5}\\\\\displaystyle PV_{new} = -10,393.16$

As the present worth of the new machine is lower, the best decision for the company is to purchase the new machine and sale the old machine.

Delaying this will incur in higher maintenance cost (1,500 - 900)

and a lower recovery value (4,000 - 2,000)

As there is no cost saving for delaying the purchase, it should be made immediately.

8 0

3 years ago

Which of the following is not generally regarded as a legitimate reason for gov't to intervene in a market?

Bess [88]

Answer:

C. To enforce property rights

Explanation:

Government intervention in market can be non materistically via regulation , materistically via taxes & subsidy.

Although the second materislistic way of tax, subsidy comes under the perview of 'Government Budget' .

Government budget is anual financial statement showing economy's expected revenue & expenditure .

Economic growth & stability by reallocation of resources , reducing income inequalities - reflect 'efficiency' & 'equity' as valid reasons .

Foreign protection is also not invalid depending upon the initial budding stage of a developing economy & its global stand. Eg - India 1950 to 1990 .

However all these are progressive legitimate reason for govt. Intervention .

But , enforcing property rights is a feature of 'socialistic (communistic) economy - which has its own demerits like loss of consumers soveireignity , lack of postive competitive efficiency , govt overburden.

7 0

3 years ago

In two or three sentences, write a brief ending you might use in an interview to be courteous and positive about following up.

AleksandrR [38]

Thank you for your time with me, I eagerly await your response (email)

Thank you for your time, would you be available again soon to follow up on these matters? (in person)

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers