Answer:
Critics of the <u>social congnitive </u> personality theory is very sensitive to an individual's interactions with particular situations, but that it gives too little attention to the person's enduring traits.
Explanation:
Social congnitive theory focusses on behavioral modification, for this they study the congnitive and social factors influencing behaviors. Since the objective is to modify conducts, they care to determine how to influence it in order for it to have a change.
The theory says, personality is determined but cognitive processes by which a person decides and acts upon but mostly refering it to social references. This way the arguments says, the theory lacks on the enduring traits of personality, the aspects by which modifications cannot be easily made.
Answer:
I'm pretty sure it's this
Explanation:
Plato users^^^
Answer:
I believe the evidence indicates the following environment:
This is a desert because there is little precipitation for plant and animal life to thrive.
Explanation:
According to the evidence, this environment is scarce in plant and animal life. Among the options given, the best ones would be tundra and desert. However, <u>the option concerning the tundra has a crucial mistake that makes it incorrect. </u>
<u>According to it, a tundra "is too hot for plant and animal to live in." However, a tundra is is an extremely cold biome consisting of snow-covered lands.</u> The tundra is, in other words, like a cold desert. <u>Both environments have little precipitation, which makes it harder for plant and animal life to thrive. </u>
<u>Since that option makes such a mistake, we can easily choose the one about the desert as the correct one: </u><u>This is a desert because there is little precipitation for plant and animal life to thrive.</u>
Answer:
From the Mississippi River in the east to the Rocky Mountains in the west.
Explanation:
