Answer:
True
Explanation:
Employees who perceive that their employers treat them fairly will always support them. This applies to good consequences (raises, awards, etc.) and also bad consequences (layoffs, penalties, wage reduction, etc.). This concept of fairness in power applies to almost all the activities in our lives.
For example, you are playing baseball and you perceive that the umpire is openly biased against you, that will make you feel disappointed, maybe even mad and definitely you will not enjoy the game. The same applies to our teachers and how they treat all the students, or our parents and how they behave with our siblings, etc.
Angela wants to calculate her take-home pay. She earns $1,377 monthly.
She pays federal tax of $200
state tax of $41.31,
and 7.65% in FICA tax.
Let's solve for Angela's monthly net pay.
=> 1 377 dollars * 0.0765 = 105.34 dollars is the FICA tax
=> 1 377 - (105.34 + 200 + 41.31)
=> 1377 - 346.65 = 1030.35 dollars is her monthly net pay,
Answer:D. reject the offer because it will produce a net loss $21,000
Explanation:
Net income or loss is the total of firm's income less it's total cost( fixed and variable) . The contract will result in a loss $5 per unit which multiply by the total units of 4200 gives $21,000
The answer is: averaged over time, Sheridan attends worship services regularly.
When we use principle of aggregation, we would not rely on single measurement to make a representation of a person's behavior. We rely more on multiple sets of measurements.
From the case above, Sheridan not attending the services for two weeks could be explained by things such as personal issues or physical illness. Since she considers herself as religious who attend regularly, it is very likely that averaged over time, Sheridan attends worship services regularly.
Answer:
Financial disadvantage of 138,600
Explanation:
![\left[\begin{array}{cccc}&produce&buy&Differential\\$Purchase&&-447,000&-447,000\\$Avoidable\: Cost&-283,400&0&283,400\\$Unavoidable\: Cost&-114,400&-114,400&0\\$Total Cost&-397,800&-561,400&-163,600\\$additional segment&0&25,000&25,000\\$Net Effect&-397,800&-536,400&-138,600\\\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bcccc%7D%26produce%26buy%26Differential%5C%5C%24Purchase%26%26-447%2C000%26-447%2C000%5C%5C%24Avoidable%5C%3A%20Cost%26-283%2C400%260%26283%2C400%5C%5C%24Unavoidable%5C%3A%20Cost%26-114%2C400%26-114%2C400%260%5C%5C%24Total%20Cost%26-397%2C800%26-561%2C400%26-163%2C600%5C%5C%24additional%20segment%260%2625%2C000%2625%2C000%5C%5C%24Net%20%20Effect%26-397%2C800%26-536%2C400%26-138%2C600%5C%5C%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
The allocate cost and teh depreciation cost will be unavoidable, so should be considered as a cost for the purchase option
Also the inocme from teh additional segment is only considered for the purchase option
<u>The avoidable cost will be:</u>
Direct Materials
Direct Labors
Variable overhead
Supervisor
Thse cost are zero in the purchase escenario
