1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
OLga [1]
2 years ago
14

HELP!!!

Social Studies
2 answers:
Maslowich2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

hi can we talk

Explanation:

aksik [14]2 years ago
7 0
I’m not going to write the whole paragraph, but I will give you some key points. Rivers are important because they are a good source of fresh water, and can help with directions based off of which way the water is flowing. The team split up because in case anything happened, some of the group would still be okay. Hope this helps!!
You might be interested in
Which of the following is an example of absolute poverty?
larisa86 [58]

Answer:

a

Explanation:

Every other choice has the money but chooses to save it. JoEllen does not have the money and does not have the option to save it.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The first land battle of the civil war took place near ________, Virginia, on july _ _, 18_ _
vladimir2022 [97]
<span>It took place near Manassas, Virginia on July 21, 1861. It was called the First Battle of Bull Run or the First Manassas. At this battle, the union army lost to the confederates. This was the battle when they realized that the war was really starting. They realized that is was essentially "game on" and nobody would go down without a fight.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
What type of document is the deceleration of independence
elena-s [515]
The United States Decleration of Independence is the pronouncement adopted by the Second Continential Congress meeting at the Pennsylvania State House in Philadelphia.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the goal of simon bolivar for latin america in the 19th century?
Allushta [10]

Bolivar stood apart from his class in ideas, values and vision. Who else would be found in the midst of a campaign swinging in a hammock, reading the French philosophers? His liberal education, wide reading, and travels in Europe had broadened his horizons and opened his mind to the political thinkers of France and Britain. He read deeply in the works of Hobbes and Spinoza, Holbach and Hume; and the thought of Montesquieu and Rousseau left its imprint firmly on him and gave him a life-long devotion to reason, freedom and progress. But he was not a slave of the Enlightenment. British political virtues also attracted him. In his Angostura Address (1819) he recommended the British constitution as 'the most worthy to serve as a model for those who desire to enjoy the rights of man and all political happiness compatible with our fragile nature'. But he also affirmed his conviction that American constitutions must conform to American traditions, beliefs and conditions.

His basic aim was liberty, which he described as "the only object worth the sacrifice of man's life'. For Bolivar liberty did not simply mean freedom from the absolutist state of the eighteenth century, as it did for the Enlightenment, but freedom from a colonial power, to be followed by true independence under a liberal constitution. And with liberty he wanted equality – that is, legal equality – for all men, whatever their class, creed or colour. In principle he was a democrat and he believed that governments should be responsible to the people. 'Only the majority is sovereign', he wrote; 'he who takes the place of the people is a tyrant and his power is usurpation'. But Bolivar was not so idealistic as to imagine that South America was ready for pure democracy, or that the law could annul the inequalities imposed by nature and society. He spent his whole political life developing and modifying his principles, seeking the elusive mean between democracy and authority. In Bolivar the realist and idealist dwelt in uneasy rivalry.

3 0
3 years ago
PLEASE. Write about pluses political regime "oligarchy"
KiRa [710]
You mean what possible advantage could Oligarchy have?

Oligarchy could mean that people in power will have good education and for example won't be manipulated by populists. For example often people choose their representatives based on very little information, and in an oligarchy, where a small portion of a society (the riches and best educated) rules, it could be more likely that the rulers will have the necessary education and preparaation.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The following are all types of groups except
    8·2 answers
  • Mill argues that all types of pleasures are the same; that is, the pleasure of eating a chocolate cake is of the same type as re
    9·1 answer
  • During an average day, 6-month-old mercedes' parents unwittingly subject her to tasks that challenge her object permanence abili
    13·1 answer
  • How did Rebecca Latimer Felton differ from other progressives nationally? She supported greater rights for women. She wanted to
    15·1 answer
  • Meredith constantly analyzes her work in terms of her individual contribution that she makes to the overall goals of the organiz
    9·1 answer
  • What is the German Parliament called?
    11·1 answer
  • What are some of the ways lobbyists influence and pressure government bodies? check all that apply.
    11·1 answer
  • What are charecterist of the Rome replubic<br><br><br> at least 5 characteristics for 100 points
    8·1 answer
  • One part of Albert Bandura’s social cognitive theory is the idea of reciprocal determinism. What is the meaning of reciprocal de
    11·1 answer
  • Nep 2020 conceptualized a concept for ancient india and its contributions to modern india and its successes and challenges. What
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!