1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lisa [10]
3 years ago
11

Reminder: For this exercise, you are required to write complete analytic paragraphs. Each paragraph must have a thesis, evidence

and logic that support the thesis, and a concluding statement.
Scenario A: Last year, the owner of a new restaurant in California had trouble getting customers to comply with the state's smoking ban. The fine for a first violation is $100. A second violation carries a fine of $200, and third and subsequent violations cost $500 each. After a third violation within one year, a representative of California's Occupational Safety and Health Administration is required to investigate complaints. Employers may be cited with fines up to $7,000 for violations classified as general or serious and fines up to $70,000 for violations classified as willfully serious. In the ban's first year in operation, the bar owner had four violations, plus a violation for a serious offense that may or may not have been willful.
1. What are the minimum and maximum amounts that the owner had to pay in fines?
2. What effect do these fines have on businesses and consumers?
3. How do these government actions protect consumers?
Law
1 answer:
Schach [20]3 years ago
8 0
Www.https-answers-go-for-now.com
You might be interested in
uppy Woes. Sam promised to sell Linda a Welsh Corgi puppy for $300 but backed out of the deal. Linda sued Sam in state court for
TEA [102]

Answer:

voir dire

Explanation:

Voir dire is a legal term that refers to the obligation that implies that defendants swear to speak only true and honest information, before reporting their case to the jury, so that the jury can decide on the case, basing their opinions only on true information. . In other words, voir dire is the moment in judgment when participants swear to tell only the truth before they begin their testimony.

3 0
3 years ago
You are watching a movie about ancient Rome when a scene of a court case appears. You see that the court hearing is
Alla [95]

Answer:

.jh

Explanation:

hope this was help full

8 0
3 years ago
An individual wants to sue an agency in a federal court to stop its action. Rank the actions they can take from first to last, p
goblinko [34]

Answer:

Our government places a high priority on the public being allowed to speak their minds about elected officials as well as other public figures. People in the public eye get less protection from defamatory statements and face a higher burden when attempting to win a defamation lawsuit.

When an official is criticized in a false and injurious way for something that relates to their behavior in office, the official must prove all of the above elements associated with normal defamation, and must also show that the statement was made with "actual malice."

"Actual malice" was defined in a U.S. Supreme Court case decided in 1988, Hustler v. Falwell. In that case, the court held that certain statements that would otherwise be defamatory were protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.

This meant that public officials could only win a defamation suit when the statement that was made wasn't an honest mistake and was in fact published with the actual intent to harm the public figure. Actual malice only occurs when the person making the statement knew the statement was not true at the time the statement was made or had a reckless disregard for whether it was true or not.

For other people that are in the public eye, such as celebrities, they too must prove that the defamatory statements were made with actual malice.

hope it helps

8 0
3 years ago
Of the problematic groups discussed in the unit, which one is most similar to the Mexican drug cartels? Which one is the most di
Rama09 [41]
Answer please say which groups were discussed in the unit
6 0
3 years ago
One way government solves problems is by
lbvjy [14]

creating public policy

Explanation:

We can understand public policy as the actions taken by the administrative branch of government that create laws and regulations in accordance with the needs of a society, community or interest groups

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • _____ is best described as a court’s order to an agent to return any funds earned as a result of breaching the duty of loyalty i
    13·1 answer
  • Resolve this issue?
    9·1 answer
  • What are some of the weaknesses in bureaucracies?
    15·1 answer
  • What should I do today
    7·1 answer
  • Write short note on prohibition​
    14·1 answer
  • Explain the legislative process how a bill becomes a law? Please!
    15·1 answer
  • Define and compare and contrast the UCR, NIBRS, and the National Crime Victimization Survey. How does each system serve a purpos
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following BEST describes the “rule of four”?
    12·1 answer
  • Which is an example of a short-term investment?
    8·2 answers
  • This is my homework and it is due in 4 hours. I will put it in the comment of this question. I will give brainliest.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!