They have done work themselves but they have only did that for about 4 months
I would need to agree that Radical Reconstruction was not sufficiently radical. The possibility of this was to change the south's general culture and conviction framework and make it more like the north. However the distinctive branches of the government couldn't deal with what was best for the country. Congress would pass laws that would help the liberated slaves, and after that the president would veto them, so congress would dwarf and abrogate the president. This occurred again and again. Because of this it was greatly hard for what the radicals needed to happen to be effective. There was insufficient power behind the new laws and amendment's, at any dislike they had utilized amid the common war
I think it’s the one in the middle
<span>They wrote a constitution that institutionalized slavery and counted slaves as 3/5 of a person.</span>
The First Continental Congress was called to address grievances against the British government. ... The First Congress started a boycott of British goods and a Second Continental Congress. The Second Continental Congress created the Declaration of Independence and the Articles of Confederation.