1. Yes i do, cause the government can easily power over the people but as soons as they do that the people will then take back the government there fore the constitution is not used by the government to control us cause if they did we could easily over turn them
2. there take of the constitution under my understanding is that if the government does something that makes the people unhappy they can look back at the constitution and say you are braking this law and now you are being over turned.
3.the social contract says that it obtains to everyone not just the people that arent in some type of government or the richest person ever it obtains to everyone. so his statment reflect cause hes saying that if the government tries to say something to use we can something back and say the constitution says we are allowed to do that or we arent. for example the right to carry a weapon we are but its not because of we like to hunt or go target shooting no its because if the government turns on us we can protect our selfs.
Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/1137967#readmore
Faking illness is my best guess :) - beanz
False he wasnt a medival writer
One drawback of voluntary trade is that it "<span>can make one group dependent upon another for necessary goods", since there is almost always a "trade advantage" for one country over the other. </span>
The abolitionist movement was met with much backlash. So much so, that it was a major cause of the civil war. Slave owners refused to aknowledge African American citizens as equals. They believed they were inferior in every way. To them, African American’s were dumber and less advanced. The false idea that they were more closely related to apes due to their skin color was used in many arguments. Another major ideal used to support slavery was the impact it had on the economy. The creation of cheaper products due to unpaid laborers greatly contributed to the economy in those times. Most of these assertions were only filled by racism and insecurity from the slave owners part, while some like the impact in the economy were morally and ethically incorrect.
