Answer:
Supranationalism is the unification of multiple states working together to achieve a common goal. Such priorities are diverse, ranging from world peace, economic benefits, military, and many more. Such member states also share political control, rules, and regulations. The European Union would be an example of that.
Devolution is the mechanism in which state regions claim an autonomous government. This can trigger a society to break up, also known as balkanisation. Yugoslavia is one example of that.
With reference to the political and economic geography of Europe, briefly discuss three changes resulting from supranationalism.
Answer:
One change in Europe that would benefit from supranationalism would be the development of the Euro, a common currency. Another move would be to create better economic power due to reduced tariffs, increased trade and open frontiers between member states. The elimination in conflicts and wars is also a significant change of policy generated by supranationalism.
With reference to the political and economic geography of Europe, briefly discuss three changes resulting from devolution.
Answer:
The formation of more states (balkanisation of former Yugoslavia) would be one change resulting from the devolution. Another adjustment would be the emergence of disputes and political instability owing to the difficulty involved in the process of devolution. Eventually, a rise in regional political power will result from a shift
translation:
What is the ecclesiastical license that allows to venerate the saints.
<span>D. Emigrants usually traveled in wagon trains of 50 to 1,000 people. Reset Selection</span>
Answer:
The caste that one belongs to serves as a strong determinant of his or her voting pattern. In India, different political parties represent the interests of different caste groups. ... The upper caste people have more freedom to vote by political beliefs. The Mandal Commission covered more than 3000 Other Backward Cast.
In ancient Indian and Egyptian civilizations it was very strong shaping force in political structures, but both the religious beliefs and the resulting political system were different, just like pharaohs were different from rajas.
The way Egyptians and Indians blended religion with politics bears certain similarities. First of all, the central role of priests, who were the Egyptians pharaohs most important advisors during the New Kingdom and at one point gained more power than the pharaoh himself. In the other hand, in India priests or Brahmans were also important political figures.