Answer:
The field of psychology would see Dr. Copycat's research as a replica of Dr. Original's original research. In that case, Dr. Copycat's experiment would be considered honest if, during publication, credits were provided for Dr. Original's research.
Explanation:
It is acceptable for scientific research to be replicated by different researchers. However, the publication of a scientific research classified as a replica must contain credits to the original research, otherwise it will be considered plagiarism.
In this case, in relation to the example shown in the question above, we can say that the field of psychology would see Dr. Copycat's research as a replica of the original research, carried out by Dr. Original. In that case, Dr. Copycat's experiment would be considered honest if, during publication, credits were provided for Dr. Original's research.
Answer:
E
Explanation:
The power of the President to refuse to approve a bill or joint resolution and thus prevent its enactment into law is the veto. ... This veto can be overridden only by a two-thirds vote in both the Senate and the House. If this occurs, the bill becomes law over the President's objections.
According to Vygotsky, The teacher's structuring process and method used to guide and shape Mary's thinking is referred to as <u>scaffolding</u><u>. </u>
<h3>
What is Vygotsky's concept of scaffolding?</h3>
Vygotsky established an instructional scaffolding concept that centered on teaching practices. He described it as "the responsibility of instructors or a tutor in helping the learner's growth by offering support structures to help the learner move to that next stage in their learning path."
So, as it is in the case of Mary with having trouble understanding how to do a math problem.
The role of the teacher is to guide her by offering support structures to help her get to the next stage.
Learn more about the concept of scaffolding here:
brainly.com/question/3706018
Answer:
Actor/observer bias
Explanation:
In psychology, the actor/observer bias refers to the tendency to attribute our own actions to external causes while attributing other people's behaviors to internal causes.
When the results of a situation are negative, if the negative outcome happened to the person, the person will likely attribute the outcome to external circumstances. But when it comes to other people, the person will attribute the outcome to the other person behaviors, habits or actions.
In this example, Jeremiah falls and thinks the ice is brutal. <u>He is attributing the fall to an external circumstance (the ice)</u>. But then, when his friend Ed falls on the same spot, he says his friend is really clumsy, <u>attributing the fall to an inner characteristic of his friend</u>. Therefore, this would be an example of actor/observer bias.
I won't ever start doing it
