Madison believed that a republic would be better than a pure democracy for a large and populous nation. Madison defined pure democracy as incapable of controlling the acts of Faction on the Government because it's a society consisting of a small number of citizens who assemble and administer government in person. A communication and concert result from the form of government itself, and there is nothing to check the inducements to sacrifice the weaker party or an obnoxious individual, etc. Pure democracy could be the best type of government in people's vote on everything from fixing a road in California, to oil drills in Alaska. In a republic the public vote for a group who will vote on it on the public's behalf among the other elected "representatives" so people in florida don't have to vote for something happening in Michigan
Its the last one because its not a true statement . They don't know for sure if they will win
Answer:
A. Summarising takes longer to do than paraphrasing
Explanation:
Because in summary you'll have to search to the most important points. So it'll take longer to finish summarising than paraphrasing
Answer:
(A) Participants who were depressed at the start of the study were no more likely to be smokers after one year than those who were not depressed.
Explanation:
This strengthens the argument, because depression doesn´t correlates directly with smoking, it rejects the idea of the Cause-Effect, that would say that maybe depression causes people to turn to smoking to deal with it, so if people were already depressed when entered the trial and weren´t more likely to those who didn´t to start smoking this eliminates that possibility.
