This question refers to the Monk in "The Canterbury Tales". The fact that the Monk tells story after story, all with the same moral, means that he is a simple man, who perceives the world in absolute and simplistic ways.
- The Monk is a part of "<u>The Canterbury Tales,</u>" which contains 24 stories by British author Geoffrey Chaucer (1343-1400).
- Among the several characters, the Monk tells different stories with the same moral.
- All of his stories aim to show characters<u> falling from Grace</u>, that is, going from a high position to a low one.
- His purpose, through his tragic stories, is <u>to warn people against trusting wealth and prosperity</u>. Reality can change, and one can go from having everything to having nothing.
- The fact that the monk teaches only the same moral reveals that he is a simple man. His view of the world is also simplistic, and he seems to believe in absolute truths.
Learn more about the book here:
brainly.com/question/14651276?referrer=searchResults
Simile. if it uses like or as it is a simile
well a utopia is a imagined perfect place so if its "your" it would be the perfect place you imagined
hope this helps :)
1)“The two geologists had been out on their first mission together to collect rock and soil samples.”This statement implies it is their first time on a mission together, Hence their first interaction.
2) “Bianca and Jordan were new members who had been recruited from different training programs.” This statement implies that they’ve never met before because they’ve been recruited from different training programs.
3) “They chatted about their backgrounds, each learning about where the other had grown up and gone to school.” This implies they had now tried to get to know each other since they haven’t talked before.
<span> It demonstrates Lincoln feels one side placed personal interest before the good of the country as a whole, while the other side was willing to fight to keep the country intact.
This sentence shows that Lincoln clearly thought one side had more justification and goodness in their reason for going to war, trying to save the country, while the other side was just willing to tear it apart. </span>