Answer: False
Explanation:
A democracy is a form of government in which the people elect leaders and rule by majority not unlimited government.
The ballet Russes revolutionized early 20th-century ballet during their residency in <u>Paris</u>.
During their Paris residency, The Ballet Russes transformed ballet in the early 20th century. Ballet is a sort of performance dance that first appeared in the fifteenth century in Italy during the Italian Renaissance. Later, in France and Russia, ballet evolved into a concert dance style.
Since then, it has developed into a well-known, extremely technical dancing style with a distinct lexicon. In many different dance genres and cultures, the fundamental methods are determined by ballet, which has had a significant global impact. Around the world, many schools have absorbed their unique cultures. Ballet has changed in distinctive ways as a result.
To know more about ballet
brainly.com/question/27854386
#SPJ4
barcelona-based design group in-tenta have developed ‘all-in-square’ – a new design idea made up of micro-architecture, modular urban furniture and external floor covering for public urban spaces and contemporary users. implemented as a temporary shop as well as information point.
Answer:Sociological research is especially important with respect to public policy debates. The political controversies that surround the question of how best to respond to terrorism and violent crime are difficult to resolve at the level of political rhetoric. Often, in the news and in public discourse, the issue is framed in moral terms and therefore, for example, the policy alternatives get narrowed to the option of either being “tough” or “soft” on crime. Tough and soft are moral categories that reflect a moral characterization of the issue. A question framed by these types of moral categories cannot be resolved using evidence-based procedures. Posing the debate in these terms narrows the range of options available and undermines the ability to raise questions about what responses to crime actually work.
In fact policy debates over terrorism and crime seem especially susceptible to the various forms of specious, unscientific reasoning described later in this chapter. The story of the isolated individual, whose specific act of violence becomes the basis for the belief that the criminal justice system as a whole has failed, illustrates several qualities of unscientific thinking: knowledge based on casual observation, knowledge based on over-generalization, and knowledge based on selective evidence. The sociological approach to policy questions is essentially different since it focuses on examining the effectiveness of different social control strategies for addressing different types of violent behaviour and the different types of risk to public safety. Thus, from a sociological point of view, it is crucial to think systematically about who commits violent acts and why.
Although moral claims and opinions are of interest to sociologists, sociological researchers use empirical evidence (that is, evidence corroborated by direct experience and/or observation) combined with the scientific method to deliver sound sociological research. A truly scientific sociological study of the social causes that lead to terrorist or criminal violence would involve a sequence of prescribed steps: defining a specific research question that can be answered through empirical observation; gathering information and resources through detailed observation; forming a hypothesis; testing the hypothesis in a reproducible manner; analyzing and drawing conclusions from the data; publishing the results; and anticipating further development when future researchers respond to and re-examine the findings.
Explanation: The major factors responsible for these experimentations had earlier being revealed and portrayed.
